Home Blog Page 163

Impending Shutdown: Political Rifts and Global Crisis Converge

0

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

As the Nov. 17 deadline for a government shutdown looms, Washington grapples with a confluence of domestic political divides and escalating global conflicts. The recent appointment of far-right House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) follows a tumultuous three-week period during which Congress went without a Speaker, underscoring the deep divisions within the Republican Party.

Johnson, who desperately tries to endear himself to the twice-impeached and now four-times indicted former President Donald Trump’s maiden legislative venture, a $14 billion bill aimed at fortifying Israel’s defense against Hamas, drew sharp criticism for its exclusion of aid to Ukraine and substantial cuts to IRS funding. The move, viewed as an overture to win favor with Trump, underscores Johnson’s conservative agenda.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) minced no words in his assessment of Johnson’s approach, emphasizing the bill’s lack of bipartisan support. “His first major legislative effort was not bipartisan at all,” Schumer stated. “And I think he’s going to learn the hard way that that doesn’t work.” He further pointed out that both the president and he had reservations about the bill, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell also did not endorse it.

Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) leveled serious concerns about Johnson’s ascendancy to the Speaker’s chair, branding him as “dangerous” due to his support for overturning the 2020 election results. Cheney, a vocal critic of Trump during her congressional tenure, argued that Johnson’s actions contradicted his professed commitment to upholding the Constitution. She remarked, “He was willing to set aside what he knew to be the rulings of the courts, the requirements of the Constitution, in order to placate Donald Trump.”

USA Today political writer Rex Huppke provided a scathing assessment of the situation, calling attention to the perceived lack of direction within House Republicans. “If you haven’t already passed out from the vacuous stupidity of all that, you might be wondering: ‘Hey, what are these House Republicans doing about the rapidly approaching Nov. 17 deadline to keep the government open?’” Huppke remarked. He went on to paint a vivid picture of internal discord, referencing legal troubles Trump faces and characterizing the House Speaker with a “disingenuous-youth-pastor vibe” facing the challenges of avoiding a government shutdown right before the holidays.

In the Senate, a bipartisan effort led to the passage of three critical government funding bills covering areas such as military construction, veterans’ affairs, agriculture, transportation, and housing. The decisive 82-15 vote aims to break the deadlock and provide a path to avert a potential shutdown. Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), a member of the Appropriations Committee, expressed hope that this progress will compel Congress to approve a short-term funding bill, affording the time needed to finalize a budget before year-end.

“There is definitely uncertainty with regard to how the House will respond to our strong bipartisan votes on appropriation bills,” Baldwin said. “But we hope that they will conclude, especially seeing the strong bipartisan votes, that the only way forward is through bipartisanship.”


Jury in Elijah McClain Wrongful Death Trial Hears Closing Arguments

(CNN) — Aurora, Colorado, police officer Nathan Woodyard ignored his training and repeatedly escalated his fatal 2019 encounter with Elijah McClain, a prosecutor said during closing arguments Friday in the cop’s manslaughter trial.

Woodyard, 34, has pleaded not guilty to reckless manslaughter and a lesser included charge of criminally negligent homicide. Woodyard, who remains suspended from the department without pay pending the trial’s outcome, is the third officer tried in connection with McClain’s death.

Last month, a Colorado jury delivered a mixed verdict to the two other officers involved in the arrest. Randy Roedema, the senior patrol officer on scene who restrained McClain on the ground, was convicted of criminally negligent homicide and assault, while officer Jason Rosenblatt, who attempted an initial unsuccessful carotid hold, was acquitted of all charges.

The case focuses on the events of August 24, 2019, when officers responded to a call about a “suspicious person” wearing a ski mask, according to an indictment. Officers confronted 23-year-old McClain, a Black massage therapist, musician and animal lover who was walking home from a convenience store carrying a plastic bag with iced tea. He wore the mask because he was frequently cold, his family has said.

In an interaction captured on body camera footage, police wrestled McClain to the ground and placed him in a carotid hold, and paramedics later injected him with the powerful sedative ketamine. His heart stopped on the way to a hospital, and he was pronounced dead three days later. The defense argued that the ketamine ultimately killed McClain.

Woodyard placed McClain in the carotid hold – a move in which an officer uses their biceps and forearm to cut off blood flow to a subject’s brain – that left McClain unconscious, according to an indictment.

The officer then released the hold, and once McClain regained consciousness, he and other officers restrained him on the ground despite his repeated pleas of “I can’t breathe,” according to the indictment.

“Mr. Woodyard admits he should have just done it all differently,” prosecutor Jason Slothouber said in closing on Friday, referring to the officer’s own testimony. “He admits, ‘Hey, I should have talked to this guy.’”

Slothouber listed a series of alleged mistakes Woodyard made that day, including ignoring his training, failing to tell paramedics McClain said he could not breathe, and deciding the encounter had not turned into a medical emergency.

“That regretful, emotional, empathetic version of Mr. Woodyard that you saw on the stand is not the version that he presented to Mr. McClain,” the prosecutor told jurors, adding that the officer was reckless and should be found guilty of manslaughter.

Defense lawyer Andrew Ho countered that Woodyard simply answered an emergency call that day and entrusted McClain to the care of fellow officers and medically trained professionals.

“Nathan Woodyard did not kill Elijah McClain,” Ho said. “He’s not responsible for what other people did or did not do.”

Ho argued that trial evidence has not pointed to Woodyard. Instead, testimony has centered on “what other people are doing and what other people are not doing and they just want (Woodyard) to take the blame.”

But, Ho argued, it was an overdose of ketamine from paramedics that ultimately killed McClain.

“Elijah McClain matters,” Ho said. “We need to end in-custody deaths. There’s been too much violence and … the world would be a better place when that happens.”

The two paramedics who treated McClain, Jeremy Cooper, 48, and Peter Cichuniec, 50, are set to go on trial in the coming weeks. They have pleaded not guilty to charges of manslaughter and assault.

Slothouber, in rebuttal, told jurors Woodyard set in motion the series of events that led to McClain’s death. “The only explanation is that the defendant caused all of this… not Elijah McClain,” he said.

Woodyard takes the stand

Woodyard took the stand in his trial on Wednesday, stating in a back-and-forth with his defense attorney he would handle the situation differently if he had it to do over.

“If you could go back knowing what you know now, would you approach him differently?” Megan Downing asked her client on direct examination.

“Yes, I would,” Woodyard responded.

“Do you think you could have tried to talk to Mr. McClain more?” Downing continued.

“Yes,” he said.

On cross-examination, prosecutor Jason Slothouber questioned Woodyard about why he didn’t tell his commanding officers or the paramedics about McClain’s claims that he couldn’t breathe.

“Despite being conscious of this risk that if somebody’s complaints of breathing were ignored they could die, you didn’t tell Sgt. (Dale) Leonard about Mr. McClain’s repeated statements, ‘I can’t breathe,’” Slothouber said.

“I did not,” Woodyard replied.

“Despite your consciousness of the risk of death from these complaints, you didn’t tell Sgt. (Rachel) Nuñez about Mr. McClain’s complaints that he can’t breathe,” Slothouber continued.

“I did not tell her,” Woodyard said.

“When you came back to the scene and Mr. McClain was about to get Ketamine and put on the gurney, you didn’t tell anyone about his complaints that he couldn’t breathe,” Slothouber said.

“No. At the time, I thought it was explained by the mask being on,” Woodyard told him.

Jury delivered mixed verdict to other 2 officers

Prosecutors initially declined to bring charges in the case, but it received renewed scrutiny following the nationwide Black Lives Matter protests in spring 2020.

In June 2020, Aurora police and city officials announced changes to police policy, including a ban on carotid holds. Later that month, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis appointed a special prosecutor to reexamine the case. And in 2021 a grand jury indicted three officers and two paramedics in McClain’s death.

Aurora ultimately agreed to pay $15 million to McClain’s family to settle a civil rights lawsuit against the city.

Last month, during the trial for Roedema and Rosenblatt, prosecutors argued that the police restraint contributed to McClain’s death, while defense attorneys said the paramedics’ decision to inject a large dose of ketamine was to blame.

An initial autopsy report said McClain’s cause of death was “undetermined.” However, an amended report released in 2022 listed “complications of ketamine administration following forcible restraint” as the cause of death.

Woodyard ‘did not follow training,’ prosecution says

During opening statements in Woodyard’s trial last month, prosecutor Ann Joyce told jurors Woodyard violated the Aurora Police Department’s de-escalation policy within seconds of contact with McClain, the prosecutor maintained.

“He’s been trained that if someone says they can’t breathe, just because they’re talking doesn’t mean they’re getting adequate oxygen into their system,” the prosecutor said of the defendant.

Joyce used Woodyard’s own words from the body camera footage.

“Mr. Woodyard told Elijah McClain, ‘I’m going to have to change this situation.’ And the evidence will be, that Mr. Woodyard was true to his word. He changed Elijah McClain’s situation forever,” she told the jury.

Defense attorney Downing countered the prosecution’s argument, saying nothing Woodyard did – not even the carotid hold – caused McClain’s death.

“None of the actions that he took, none of the force that he used, is what caused the death in this case,” Downing told the jury.

“There is one, and only one, undisputed cause of death in this case – no matter how many sequential dots that they will ask you to connect – and that is a lethal injection of ketamine,” she said.

CNN’s Eric Levenson contributed to this report.


This Course Uses Big Data to Examine how American Newspapers Covered Lynchings

By Rob Wells, University of Maryland

Title of course:

Lynching and the Press

What prompted the idea for the course?

One of my students was reviewing a spreadsheet that listed total lynchings by state. She exhaled, and then, with a bit of weariness, said, “Mississippi, goddamn.”

She was trying to comprehend the enormity of violence against the Black population of Mississippi: 823 lynchings from 1865 to 2011, according to the Tolnay-Beck and Seguin lynching inventories, two of the main academic resources in this field. She is one of 13 University of Maryland journalism students digging through historic newspaper articles and data tables this semester to learn about how U.S. newspapers covered lynching.

The class is an extension of an award-winning 2021 student journalism project called “Printing Hate,” published by the Howard Center for Investigative Journalism at the University of Maryland, which examined various case studies of lynching coverage.

My class is taking a much longer view of this kind of journalism, using big data tools to examine newspaper coverage of lynchings from 1789 through 1963. In the process, students will gain important insights about our country’s history. They are learning about the societal context that allowed more than 5,000 mob-driven murders of Black citizens to happen and how some mainstream news coverage reinforced the violent white supremacy of these events. Newspapers, for example, frequently used dehumanizing language to describe the lynching victims as “fiends” or “black brutes.”

“The lynching of Jim Redmond, Gus Roberson, and Bob Addison, and one onlooker. May 17, 1892. Habersham County, Georgia. Gelatin silver paint. 4 3/4 x 6 3/4″.” (Info quoted from p. 165.) // Wikimedia Commons

What does the course explore?

The core of the class involves analyzing data from 60,000 news pages captured from the Library of Congress’ Chronicling America database of historic newspapers. This project began as an academic study with my colleague Sean Mussenden, the data editor at the Howard Center and senior lecturer at the Philip Merrill College of Journalism. A prominent journalism historian, Kathy Roberts Forde, at the University of Massachusetts Amherst later joined our team.

After working with this large dataset, I decided to offer a class so students could learn research skills, such as data and content analysis, while also learning more about history and the history of U.S. journalism.

What materials does the course feature?

• “Southern Horrors: Lynch Law in All Its Phases,” by journalist Ida B. Wells.

• “Journalism and Jim Crow: White Supremacy and the Black Struggle for a New America,” by Kathy Roberts Forde and Sid Bedingfield.

• “They Left Great Marks On Me: African American Testimonies of Racial Violence from Emancipation to World War I,” by Kidada Williams.

What’s a critical lesson from the course?

Working with a sample of this data from newspaper lynching articles, students compared the lynching location with the location of the newspaper. It took about three weeks for the class to classify some 3,000 news articles on a Google form and sheet that I had prepared. Students’ preliminary research is exploring why some Southern newspapers would cover lynching outside the state but not in their own backyards. Students are wondering if this was a form of erasure of local history.

Later this semester, my students will research the tone of newspaper narratives about lynching, such as how the news coverage portrayed the mob. The one graduate student in the class, who is pursuing her Ph.D. in history, is examining lynching in the antebellum era, a period for which there is very little research on this topic available.

Why is this course relevant now?

My students write weekly reflections about the readings and coursework. This course has opened their eyes to how the news media’s negative portrayals of African Americans can support systems of white supremacy. Few mainstream newspaper articles reflected Black voices, except, of course, the Black press.

What will the course prepare students to do?

These students will leave this class with in-depth data and content analysis skills. They will acquire a keen sensitivity to portrayals of Black Americans and other people of color in news coverage. Ultimately, we hope the course will lead to better journalism.

____The Conversation

Rob Wells, Associate Professor, University of Maryland

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


10 Photos to Remind You of Obama’s First Presidential Election Victory

0

By Liz Courquet-Lesaulnier, Word in Black 

Do you remember where you were when you heard the news that Barack Obama had won the 2008 presidential election? Do you remember who you were with?

November 4, 2023, marks 15 years since the junior senator from Illinois made history by defeating John McCain, the senior senator from Arizona, and becoming the 44th president of the United States.

An elderly Black woman working as a poll worker handed me my ballot, a smile beaming from her face, and I started crying. I still have my stub from that ballot, proof that I was part of history. And I remember later on that night, after the Obama victory had been announced, my two sons jumped around, screaming and yelling out the window, “Barack Obama is the President!!!” And I cried some more.

I took this screenshot of the Chicago Tribune home page after Obama won on Nov. 4, 2008.

We are now 15 years removed from that historic moment when the United States, a nation built on the backs of our enslaved ancestors, elected a Black man to the highest office in the land.

In Obama, so many Black Americans didn’t just see a politician. We saw, in him, fragments of our collective selves — the hopes of Harlem Renaissance poets, the determination of Civil Rights marchers, the ambition of Black students trapped in deliberately underfunded schools. And we saw the deferred dreams of our elders.

We’ve lived a lot of life since then — the Great Recession and the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trump presidency, the election of Joe Biden as president and Kamala Haris as his vice president. Sadly, we got used to taking to social media and hashtagging the names of Black folks killed by the police — Tamir Rice, George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and hundreds more. Every year, some folks mark how old Trayvon Martin would be if George Zimmerman hadn’t gunned him down in February 2012 while he walked home with a pack of Skittles and a can of Arizona Iced Tea. There’s the ever-present specter of war. Gas, food, and rent are higher than high… the whitelash keeps whitelashing, the world is heavy with the burden of pain and suffering, and sometimes it all makes it difficult to remember what hope and change felt like.

So we need reminders of what is possible, reminders of what happens when we show up and vote, reminders that despite the white supremacy-based efforts of individuals and institutions who don’t want change, in the end, progress can’t be stopped. Yes, the work to achieve true racial justice and equality is still there to be done, and as so many people have said, having Barack Obama as president didn’t end anti-Black racism. But him being president mattered. Having Michelle Obama as our first lady mattered. Having Sasha and Malia in the White House and watching them grow up like they were our play cousins mattered. Fifteen years later, let these photos serve as a reminder of what it felt like to witness how far Black America has come.

Hope and Change

Barack Obama Rally in Grant Park November 4, 2008

A Black Family Becomes the First Family

Barack Obama and his family on the final night of the 2008 DNC // Wikimedia Commons

A Black First Lady

Barack Obama and Michelle Obama exciting the stage after a campaign stop in Des Moines, IA. (Cropped from original picture) // Luke Vargas // Wikimedia Commons

Black Children Headed to the White House

Black Children Headed to the White House // Callie Shell // Wikimedia Commons

The Obamas and the Bidens

President Barack Obama, First Lady Michelle Obama, daughters Sasha and Malia, Vice President Joe Biden, Dr. Jill Biden and the Biden family wave to the crowd as confetti rains down, following the President’s election night remarks at McCormick Place in Chicago, Illinois, Nov. 6, 2012. Also pictured are Beau, Hallie, Natalie, Baby Hunter, Hunter, Kathleen, Naomi, Finnegan, Maisy, Ashley Biden, and Howard Krein. (Official White House Photo by David Lienemann) // Wikimedia commons

The First Black President-Elect

President Barack Obama in the Oval Office on his first day in office 1/21/09. Official White House Photo by Pete Souza. // Wikimedia Commons

Making Our Ancestors Proud

Obama Rally in Grant Park // Wikimedia commons

New Social Security Increase Provides a Lifeline for Black Retirees

The economy is gnawing at the wallets of Americans, and even more so for those who rely on Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits.

Fortunately, the Social Security Administration announced in October an increase of benefits by 3.2% for more than 71 million Americans who receive Social Security and SSI benefits. In 2024, recipients can expect an additional $50 or more monthly.

“Social Security and SSI benefits will increase in 2024, and this will help millions of people keep up with expenses,” said Kilolo Kijakazi, acting commissioner of Social Security, in a statement.

Social Security is a federal retirement program that provides benefits and a source of income for eligible retired workers who are 65 or older. According to the administration, there are more than 66 million beneficiaries. Supplemental Security Income provides monthly payments for an estimated 7.5 million people with disabilities or low-income older adults.

“Almost every worker in the nation pays into it,” says Kathleen Romig, director of social security and disability policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “They and their family members can get benefits based on those earnings during one of these circumstances — death, disability, or retirement.”

Some Americans receive both Social Security and SSI benefits. It’s the largest poverty-fighting benefit, Romig says, and without them, four in 10 Americans would live in poverty.

Approximately 7.7 million Black Americans receive Social Security, 2.5 million collect SSI, and around 1 million reap both, according to the Census Bureau. On average, Black men over 65 receive $14,918 a year, and Black women of the same age get $13,636 a year.

With rising rents and utilities and increases in the cost of food and transportation, more than $15,000 a year is needed to live on for many Americans.

The administration has implemented a cost-of-living adjustment, also known as a COLA, every year starting in 2016, ranging from 0.3% to 8.7% in 2022. The newest boost will take effect as early as Dec. 29, 2023 for SSI and January 2024 for Social Security.

The Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) from the third quarter of the prior year compared to the corresponding quarter of the current year determines if there will be an increase. In this case, the administration used data from the late summer and fall of 2022 and compared it with the numbers from 2023.

“The cost-of-living adjustment maintains the purchasing power of those benefits,” Romig says. “That’s so important because other sources of retirement income are subject to either inflation risk or investment risk.”

Pensions do not increase with inflation, unlike these benefit programs. Other retirement vehicles like a 401(k) or Roth IRA use a mix of stocks and bonds that fluctuate daily based on market performance.

To see more money from these programs for Black Americans, ending institutional and systemic barriers in “education, employment, earnings, marriage, health, disability, and mortality would significantly increase annual and lifetime Social Security benefits for Black adults,” a report from the Urban Institute found.

While inflation is moving closer to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels, it is still high enough for Americans to feel the effects, with some expense categories hit harder than others. “That’s why it is so valuable that Social Security and SSI benefits keep up with inflation,” Romig says. “So that people can stay on top of the rising prices of those basic things.”


I Studied 1 Million Home Sales in Metro Atlanta and Found that Black Families are Being Squeezed out of Homeownership by Corporate Investors

By Brian Y. An, Georgia Institute of Technology

In the years since the Great Recession, when housing prices dramatically fell, Wall Street investors have been buying large numbers of single-family homes to use as rentals. As of 2022, big investment firms owned nearly 600,000 such properties nationwide.

Critics say this practice drives up home prices and worsens the housing shortage, making it harder for families to afford to buy. Industry advocates dismiss such charges, arguing that large investment firms own a tiny fraction of single-family rental housing across the U.S. – less than 4% of the total.

As a professor of public policy at Georgia Tech, I wanted to understand how this trend was affecting my neighbors. So I analyzed more than 1 million property sales in the Atlanta metropolitan area from 2007 to 2016. Since the study period included the mortgage crisis, I excluded bulk sales, such as the packages of foreclosed homes, that aren’t available to typical homebuyers. I examined only arm’s-length transactions of single-family detached homes, where buyers and sellers act independently.

I found that global investment firms buying up local properties are indeed hurting Atlanta families – specifically, Black ones.

Neighborhood transformations

In the period I studied, homeownership declined across the Atlanta metro area by more than 5 percentage points, similar to a nationwide trend. For an average neighborhood, home purchasing by large corporate investors explained one-quarter of that decline.

But when I broke the analysis down by race, I found that Black families were hit much harder: Large investment firms buying up local properties explained fully three-quarters of the decline in African American homeownership. In contrast, non-Hispanic whites were largely unaffected.

It turns out that while Wall Street firms control just a sliver of the single-family rental market nationally, they can have much more influence at the local level. In the Atlanta metro area, these firms own nearly one-third of all single-family rental properties. They’re even more concentrated in predominantly Black neighborhoods, where more than 10 houses in a row can be owned by the same corporation.

In my study, I found that large investors tend to snap up housing in majority-nonwhite, lower-income suburban neighborhoods. This makes home buying even more challenging for middle-class families of color, as they get pushed out of the bidding market by global investors.

Home is where the financial security is

Homeownership has long been one of the main pathways for the American middle class to accumulate wealth. Despite this, the national homeownership rate declined by 5.5 percentage points between 2007 and 2016, reaching a five-decade low of 62.9%. Although homeownership has rebounded somewhat since 2016, it remains below pre-2008 levels.

And who owns these homes is starkly divided by race. Between 2015 and 2019, more than 70% of white families owned a home, compared with just 41% of Black families, according to an analysis by Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies.

To be sure, policies like racial covenants, discriminatory mortgage lending practices and redlining fueled low homeownership rates for Black Americans long before the Great Recession. But global investors’ growing control of single-family homes only widens existing racial gaps in homeownership and wealth.

Directions for new research

While my study focused on Atlanta, it’s not the only place where residents are competing with global investors for housing. Investment firms’ single-family rental portfolios are largely concentrated in Sun Belt metro areas, including Phoenix, Charlotte and Jacksonville. It wouldn’t be surprising to see similar conflicts playing out in those cities.

Since my analysis stopped in 2016, I can’t be sure that Black Atlanta residents are still affected by Wall Street firms buying up housing. Many investment firms have recently been switching from a buy-to-rent business model to a build-to-rent model, which could complicate matters.

In the meantime, while residents and policymakers have claimed that large corporations don’t invest in local communities, researchers lack robust evidence this is the case. Academics should study whether properties owned by institutional landlords are more likely to be poorly maintained or have code violations, as anecdotal evidence suggests.

It’s also worth investigating whether big investment firms undermine local revenue collection by serially filing property tax appeals.

An open-source tool for housing policy research

It’s been hard for researchers to identify corporate-owned, single-family homes, since it requires proprietary real-estate data and labor-intensive number crunching. In a separate project, my colleagues and I have developed a simple, user-friendly methodology that gets around such challenges with the use of open-source software and public tax parcel data.

Local governments and nonprofits can use our methodology to unveil all the corporate-owned residential properties in any neighborhood and link them to outcomes such as code violations. Using data-driven approaches like this is an important step toward developing policy solutions.

____The Conversation

Brian Y. An, Director of Master of Science in Public Policy Program & Assistant Professor of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


Missing Evidence has Turned Up in the James Brown Case. A lawyer is Asking the FBI to Investigate

(CNN) — James Brown died in 2006, but he has yet to rest in peace. His children and advisors spent years fighting over his colossal fortune. A daughter claimed his crypt was empty. A court ruled that his fourth wife was not really his wife.

And more than a dozen people who knew the Godfather of Soul have called for an autopsy or criminal investigation of his death.

The story keeps getting stranger. In recent weeks, the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office in Atlanta said it found potential evidence related to Brown that had somehow been missing for more than a year.

And a lawyer for the woman who turned in the evidence says he’s asked the FBI to look into the matter.

The controversy with the DA’s office began in 2020, when a former associate of Brown named Jacque Hollander submitted a green plastic bin full of potential evidence — including a black stiletto shoe and a handwritten note — and said it could help prove that Brown had been murdered.

Paul Howard, then the district attorney, said his investigators would speak with half a dozen potential witnesses named by Hollander and decide what to do from there. But in internal case documents obtained by CNN via the Georgia Open Records Act, there is no indication those interviews ever happened.

Howard lost an election later that year to challenger Fani Willis, who closed the Brown inquiry in 2021 without taking action. When Hollander asked the DA’s office to return the green plastic bin and the items therein, she got a mysterious response.

“We have shipped the items requested,” assistant chief of evidence William Chris Clark wrote to her.

But instead of the green plastic bin, officials sent her a cardboard box that contained mostly old newspaper clippings — as well as two old mobile phones that she did not remember seeing before. Despite repeated inquiries from both Hollander and CNN, no one would explain what had happened to the green bin and the potential evidence.

Early this year, Hollander sued the DA’s office, seeking answers about the missing items. When the DA failed to respond to the lawsuit, Hollander filed a motion for default judgment. In May, attorneys finally responded to that motion, blaming “excusable neglect.”

The motion and the lawsuit are still pending — Hollander’s attorney says the DA’s office has yet to turn over all the documents he’s seeking under the Georgia Open Records Act — but in September, the DA’s office finally shipped the green plastic bin and the items in evidence bags back to Hollander’s attorney.

No one explained where the items had been for the previous 18 months, or how they were found. A spokesman for the DA has not returned numerous inquiries for multiple stories regarding James Brown dating back more than two years.

A CNN reporter listened via speakerphone on the day Hollander and her attorney, Michael Iasparro, opened the green plastic bin and catalogued the items. They said documentation in the bin made it appear the bin had remained sealed since February 12, 2020, the day Hollander turned it over.

“You can tell that no one ever, ever even looked at this evidence,” Hollander said.

While the DA’s office has not publicly explained why the inquiry was closed without action, Assistant DA Michael Sprinkel wrote in an internal email in 2021 that after he’d spoken with Jacque Hollander for “probably 10+ hours,” he didn’t have “reasonable suspicion that a crime occurred.”

Some people think Brown was murdered. But the full truth surrounding his death remains unknown

Iasparro, Hollander’s attorney, worked closely with the FBI during his six years as a federal prosecutor. After the green plastic bin turned up again, he requested an appointment with the FBI regarding Brown’s death and the conduct of the DA’s office.

Iasparro said he met with a supervisory FBI agent October 10 at the Rockford, Illinois, office of Hinshaw & Culbertson, where he is a partner. He said he told the agent what happened and handed over a stack of documents related to Hollander’s lawsuit against the district attorney.

“That referral’s been made,” Iasparro said. “We’ll see what they do with it.”

A CNN reporter asked the FBI about the meeting and what would happen next.

“Unfortunately,” Chicago-based Special Agent and Public Affairs Officer Siobhan Johnson replied in an email, “Department of Justice policy prevents the FBI from commenting on the existence, non-existence, or nature of any investigation that may be occurring.”

Those who have asked for more answers regarding Brown’s death include his son Daryl and Brown’s manager, Frank Copsidas, who told CNN in a 2022 interview that Brown “was murdered” and that “somebody wanted him dead.”

But law enforcement authorities have yet to conduct a full investigation, and the DA’s office has never publicly explained why it ended its limited inquiry in 2021 without seeking an autopsy.

Sandy Monroe, a county attorney representing the DA’s office in the lawsuit, spoke to CNN briefly by phone in early October.

“I can’t discuss the case with you,” she said.

She was asked how the potential evidence had been lost and how it was eventually found.

“I am not at liberty to tell you that,” she said.

All these years after Brown’s death, the full truth remains unknown.

In a 2017 interview with CNN, Marvin Crawford, the doctor who signed Brown’s death certificate, said he wanted an autopsy to find out how Brown really died. That autopsy has not been done.

In a 2018 interview, Brown’s daughter Deanna declined to confirm or deny whether Brown’s body was in the crypt.

In 2020, Brown’s friend Andre White died, taking his secrets to his grave — including the whereabouts of what he claimed was a vial of blood that might have shed light on what killed Brown.

Almost seven years after she first called CNN to report her suspicions, Jacque Hollander’s conclusions remain the same:

“What happened to James Brown is, he was murdered for money.”


Confronting Our Silent Killers

Meet our silent killers. They lurk. They creep. Like assailants in the dark, they can quickly swoop down and consume us in a deadly clutch. They are sinister and sometimes strike without warning. For Black women, they exact incalculable harm to our bodies, our families, and our life chances.

The most far-reaching silent killer across generations, geography, and economic status is racism and inequality that denies us access, opportunity, and a fair chance. Their first cousin is bias — sometimes intentional but often implicit — reflected in cues and missteps of health care providers, baked into the very medical system that should save us.

For Tara Robinson, that outright bias doomed her to one hellish week in which she suffered three heart attacks over three days. Sent home twice and repeatedly dismissed, she said the third coronary crisis sent her to heaven and back.

“I had actually gone into sudden death,” remembers Robinson, then a 40-year-old Houston school counselor.

Ten years later, Robinson, the founder of the Black Heart Association, insists Black women’s safety net is being seen and heard.  The BHA mission: To eliminate heart-health disparity in the Black community through advocacy, education, and empowerment.

Heart disease and stroke are the leading killers of Black people. According to the American Heart Association, black women have almost twice the risk of stroke than their white counterparts and are more likely to die at an earlier age than women of other ethnic groups.

Alarming data estimates that half of Black women age 20 and older will have heart disease, but more than one-third of them are unaware of the signs or risk factors.

I realized I could no longer hide in silence. I could no longer hide in fear.

TANJA THOMPSON

Silence is a killer, especially when held within. So says Tanja Thompson, a two-time breast cancer survivor and the founder of Breast Cancer Move Foundation. The Air Force veteran and motivational speaker says her second stint with breast cancer five years after her initial diagnosis convinced her that activism was her lifeline.

“There are other women who look like me who are going through this kind of ordeal,” Thompson recalls. “I realized I could no longer hide in silence. I could no longer hide in fear.”

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer fatalities for Black women, with colorectal and cervical cancer vying for second and third place, respectively. Black women are struck younger, diagnosed later, die quicker, and suffer the most virulent forms. Black women under 35 experience twice the rate of white women, with 39% higher recurrence and 71% higher risk of death.

Endometriosis, another deadly affliction for Black women, is deemed a “silent epidemic globally” by the World Health Organization (WHO). Affecting an estimated 10 percent of reproductive-age women worldwide, African American women, notably affected with disproportionate death rates, often have a late diagnosis or the condition is misdiagnosed as fibroid tumors. According to WHO, a staggering 90% of women with endometriosis report being dismissed or disbelieved by healthcare professionals.

Maternal mortality is another fatal but preventable condition at crisis proportions for Black women who are not seen, heard, or cared for. The astronomical rate of maternal mortality affecting African Americans contributes to this country’s status as the worst place to give birth among high-income nations.

In Maryland, the Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs reports Black women are four times more likely to experience a pregnancy-related death than White women. This disparity persists even when controlling for education, body mass index, and socio-economic status.

Diabetes and Kidney Disease are also pernicious silent killers that disproportionately strike Black people. In fact, diabetes-triggered end-stage renal disease is nearly three times more prevalent in African Americans.

Bernadine Watson, author of a newly-released book Transplant: A Memoir, shares her nearly 40-year journey with kidney disease that included two transplants and two lingering encounters with dialysis. Hers is a story of blood, tears, and triumph. But during most of her illness, Watson suffered in silence, keeping her kidney disease a secret even from her family.

Develop a spiritual practice and talk to yourself about how you want to live — sick or healthy.

BERNADINE WATSON

Like most survivors in this story, Watson is a striver who forged a transformational path to life and living by confronting her illness free of shame, silence, or submission. Always wanting to write a book, at 70, she did it, sharing her story with the world.

“Don’t wait until you’re on dialysis or your kidneys are failing,” Watson advises. She urges that during your annual physical, insist that your kidney functions be checked.

Her parting shot: “Develop a spiritual practice and talk to yourself about how you want to live — sick or healthy.”

Tara Robinson of the Black Heart Association is a thriver who transformed adversity into activism and illness into empowerment. She issued a clarion call to action. “Dear Black women, find balance in your lives. Know your stressor. Know your triggers. And take time to breathe.”

Gwen McKinney is creator of Unerased | Black Women Speak.

For more information on the Silent Killers, check out this video.


Court Battle Begins in Minnesota Over Trump’s Ballot Eligibility

0

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

Former President Donald Trump faces yet another legal battle as oral arguments commence in Minnesota on Thursday, Nov. 2, where the state’s Supreme Court will weigh a case challenging his appearance on the state’s ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The plaintiffs in the case cite Trump’s actions surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

The Minnesota case marks the second courtroom showdown this week questioning Trump’s eligibility for public office. Earlier, arguments began in Colorado, where several election integrity groups are trying to have the twice-impeached and four-times indicted former president removed from the ballot.

Trump, who is currently immersed in a civil business fraud trial in New York where a judge has already determined he committed financial crimes, faces 91 felony charges that could land him a more than 800-year prison sentence for his actions after his loss to President Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election. This year, a civil jury also found Trump responsible for sexually assaulting a writer.

In Minnesota, the justices could dismiss the lawsuit, potentially prompting an appeal from the petitioners. Alternatively, they could advance the case, potentially appointing a special master to oversee proceedings, present evidence, and call witnesses to testify. The special master would then furnish the findings and facts of the case to the justices, who would ultimately determine Trump’s eligibility for Minnesota’s ballot.

Voters contend that Trump’s actions on Jan. 6 render him unfit for office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which stipulates that an individual is ineligible for future office if, while in office, they engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution or provided aid and comfort to its enemies, unless granted amnesty by a two-thirds vote of Congress.

The nonprofit organization Free Speech for People represents the state voters seeking to bar Trump from the ballot. Their clients include a former state secretary and a former Minnesota Supreme Court justice. The petitioners in the case are suing Minnesota’s Democratic Secretary of State, Steve Simon, urging the Supreme Court to prohibit Trump’s appearance on the state’s ballot. Free Speech for People had previously challenged the candidacies of several members of Congress in 2022, invoking Section 3. Notably, in a case against Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the plaintiffs could not provide sufficient evidence.


NAACP California-Hawaii State Conference Hosts 36th Annual State Convention

By Antonio Ray Harvey, California Black Media

The NAACP California Hawaii State Conference (Cal-Hi NAACP) held its 36th annual State Convention at the San Francisco Airport Marriott Waterfront Hotel.

The convention featured a series of workshops and discussions organized to promote solutions for some of the most pressing issues impacting Black communities in California and Hawaii. The focus was on a range of topics, including next-generation leadership, environmental justice, housing, veteran’s affairs, labor, education, and more.

“This is when we bring our branches to get them trained up and ready to go back into their communities ready to fight for what we’re fighting,” said NAACP Cal-Hi President Rick Callender. “What we are fighting, we’re fighting for criminal justice, environmental justice, equity in education, equity in the legislation and trying to move the NAACP’s agenda forward.”

Asm. Mia Bonta (D-Alameda) spoke about her work with NAACP California Hawaii State Conference and the NAACP Branch in Oakland. Oct. 27, 2023. CBM photo by Antonio Ray Harvey.

This year’s event, themed “This Is How We Thrive,” was held from Oct. 27 to 29. Around 500 NAACP Cal-Hi leaders, delegates, elected officials, activists, organizers, faith leaders, and entertainers from across the state and Hawaii participated in the festivities.

Keynote speakers at this year’s Convention included Dr. Hazel N. Dukes (Spingarn Medalist, NAACP Board of Directors, NAACP New York President), Eleni Kounalakis (Lt. Governor of California), Rob Bonta (California Attorney General), Shevann Steuben (NAACP Texas Youth & College Division President, NAACP Houston, Young Adult Committee Chair, NAACP Board of Directors), Oakland City Councilwoman Treva Reid (District 7) and Los Angeles-based attorney Kamilah Moore (Chair, California Reparations Task Force).

Moore reminded the attendees at the Women In the NAACP Labor Luncheon on Oct. 28 that the NAACP has been a beacon of light ensuring Black Americans are granted their constitutional rights.

Since Feb. 12, 1909, the NAACP has advocated, agitated, and litigated for civil rights. Its legacy is built on a foundation of grassroots activism by the biggest civil rights pioneers of the 20th century and is sustained by 21st century activists.

“We are resiliently surviving the afterlife of chattel slavery. In fact, as African Americans we have been confronting these lingering badges and incidents of slavery without any significant government aid or private actions. We’ve been doing it on our own and the NAACP is a testament of that,” Callender said during the luncheon.

Former NAACP California Hawaii State Conference President Alice Huffman (in the foreground) was honored with the Hats Off Award of Distinction at the civil rights organizations’ state convention at the Marriott Waterford Hotel in San Francisco. Shown left to right in the background are San Francisco NAACP President Dr. Rev. Amos Brown, Dr. Hazel N. Dukes (Spingarn Medalist, NAACP Board of Directors, NAACP New York President), Asm. Mia Bonta (D-Alameda), and Los Angeles-based attorney Kamilah Moore. Oct. 27, 2023. CBM photo by Antonio Ray Harvey.

Several influential leaders — U.S. Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA-12), Assemblymember Mia Bonta (D-Alameda), Exodie C. Roe III (General Services Administration, Washington D.C.), NAACP Senior Vice President of Communications Trovon C. Williams — spoke at the convention.

NAACP Cal-Hi’s Youth and College Division hosted multiple workshops, including a “Stop the Hate Mock Trial,” and another titled “Youth Focused Dinner, Juvenile Justice Workshop, and Health Forum.”

On Oct. 27, NAACP Cal-Hi presented an exclusive preview of “The Space Race,” a National Geographic documentary that

weaves together stories of Black astronauts seeking to break the bonds of social injustice in their quest to reach for the stars.

On the evening of Oct. 28, Callender joined Dr. Hazel N. Dukes for a fireside chat at the President’s Awards Dinner. Earlier, on the afternoon of Oct. 27, a special “Hats Off Award” ceremony was held honoring Alice Huffman, President Emeritus of the NAACP Cal-HI State Conference, at the WIN Luncheon.

From this day on, the Hats Off Award will be incorporated into the convention to recognize individuals from California and Hawaii who have demonstrated outstanding leadership and commitment to social justice and equity.

Huffman was first elected president of the Cal-Hi NAACP in 1999 and served eight terms of unwavering service and provided significant contributions.

She expressed her gratitude for having an award named after her and said she was proud

Los Angeles-based attorney Kamilah Moore shared information about the California Reparations Task Force and the importance of the NAACP. Oct. 27, 2023. CBM photo by Antonio Ray Harvey.

to be around appreciative people at the convention who understood the work she performed for the Cal-Hi NAACP.

“It’s an honor to see all of you, feel your love, feel your understanding and appreciation,” Huffman said. “Let me tell you, it wasn’t always easy, but it was great. I hope that I never let you down. I don’t think that I ever have. I don’t know what else to say to you all but thank you, thank you, thank you.”


Jury Awards $1.78 Billion in Damages in Realtors’ Commission Inflation Case

0

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

A jury in Missouri has found the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and several residential brokerages liable for conspiring to artificially inflate commissions for home sales, resulting in a staggering $1.78 billion in damages. The potential payout may escalate to $5 billion, factoring in the treble damages made possible by the verdict.
Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway-owned HomeServices of America, its two subsidiaries, and Keller Williams Realty were among the other real estate groups found guilty of participating in the conspiracy.

At the heart of the case were home sellers’ objections to an association rule mandating them to offer a nonnegotiable commission to buyers’ agents before listing a home online, typically ranging from 5% to 6%. The plaintiffs argued that this rule stifled competition and increased home prices. The verdict, however, liberates sellers from being compelled to pay buyers’ agents while agents gain the autonomy to set their commission rates.
The landmark decision paves the way for potential similar lawsuits to surface in other states. This week, a lawsuit was filed in Missouri against the association and other brokerages, including Redfin, Compass, and Douglas Elliman. The suit contends that the rule requiring home sellers to pay commissions to buyers’ agents infringes upon the Sherman Antitrust Act.

The case dates to 2019, when a group of home sellers initiated legal action against the National Association of Realtors and various residential brokerages. While Anywhere Real Estate and REMAX Holdings were initially named as defendants, both parties settled for a cumulative $140 million before the commencement of the trial, according to reports from the Wall Street Journal.
Michael Ketchmark, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs, hailed the verdict as “a tremendous day of accountability for these companies.”

In response to the ruling, NAR President Tracy Kasper stated that the matter is far from concluded. She said the association intended to appeal the liability finding, emphasizing their belief that NAR rules serve the best interests of consumers, foster market-driven pricing, and promote healthy business competition. Additionally, Kasper indicated that they remain optimistic about prevailing in the case. In the interim, NAR plans to request a reduction in the damages awarded by the jury.

Kasper further highlighted in court that NAR’s rules ultimately benefit consumers and ensure the efficiency, transparency, and equity of local MLS broker marketplaces. The cooperative compensation rule, she argued, allows sellers to achieve higher prices for their homes and exposes them to a broader pool of potential buyers. Additionally, buyers gain increased access to more homes and representation options.

“We will appeal the liability finding because we stand by the fact that NAR rules serve the best interests of consumers, support market-driven pricing, and advance business competition,” Kasper said. “We remain optimistic we will ultimately prevail. In the interim, we will ask the court to reduce the damages awarded by the jury.”


Judge Sneed and Judge Austin Join Record Number of Black Women Nominated to Federal Bench

0

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

President Biden this week nominated Judge Julie S. Sneed and Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin to the U.S. District Courts for the Middle District of Florida and the District of South Carolina, respectively. The White House said the nominations continue to show Biden’s ongoing commitment to diversify the federal judiciary and ensure that the nation’s courts reflect the multifaceted nature of the United States.

With 32 Black women appointed by Biden already confirmed by the Senate for lifetime judgeships, “The Biden-Harris administration continues to set records when it comes to professional and demographic diversity,” Stephen Benjamin, director of the White House Office of Public Engagement and a senior adviser to the President, said in a statement to TheGrio, which first reported the nominations.
Benjamin noted that the number of Black female federal judges appointed under this administration surpasses any single administration in history.

Both Judge Sneed and Judge Austin are exceptionally well-qualified, with impressive legal careers before their nominations. Sneed has served as a U.S. magistrate judge for the Middle District of Florida since June 2015. Before her judgeship, she gained extensive experience as a partner and associate at law firms Akerman LLP and Fowler White Boggs Banker, P.A. Additionally, she worked as a law clerk for Judge James D. Whittemore on the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida and Judge Chris W. Altenbernd on the Florida Second District Court of Appeal. Her legal education includes a J.D. from Florida State University College of Law and a B.S. from the University of Florida.

Austin has served as a U.S. magistrate judge for the District of South Carolina since 2011. Before her judicial career, she built a solid foundation in private practice at Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, where she worked her way up from associate to partner. Austin also served as a law clerk for Judge Matthew J. Perry Jr. on the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina. She holds a J.D. from the University of South Carolina School of Law and a B.S. from the University of South Carolina School of Engineering.

Biden’s commitment to increasing diversity on the federal bench has yielded results, with two-thirds of the 148 life-tenured federal judges confirmed so far being women and people of color. This includes a record number of civil rights lawyers and public defenders, which the White House said emphasized the administration’s dedication to promoting fairness and justice within the judicial system.

Among Biden’s most celebrated judicial nominees is Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who made history last year as the first Black woman to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court. “These choices also continue to fulfill the President’s promise to ensure that the nation’s courts reflect the diversity that is one of our greatest assets as a country—both in terms of personal and professional backgrounds,” White House officials said in a release.


Accessibility Toolbar

Unlike many news organizations, Voice & Viewpoint delivers content that matters to you. Help us keep it that way by making a generous donation for as low as $2. Your support will fund local, investigative journalism for the community, by the community.

© The San Diego Voice and Viewpoint

Submit Community News Advertise Contact Us Subscribe Our Team Privacy Policy