Home Blog Page 165

Rynell Marion Baker II

Rynell Marion Baker II, affectionately known as “Chuk” (Chuka), was born on December 30, 1988, to Carmen Dukes and Rynell Marion Baker. This world was graced with his loving, courageous, and spirited presence for 34 beautiful years. Rynell’s early education took place at Washington Elementary School, and he later graduated from Sam and Rose Stein Education Center.

Despite being diagnosed with Epileptic Aphasia at the age of five and becoming nonverbal due to this diagnosis, Rynell never allowed his condition to define him. Instead, he lived life with a spirit of adventure, often finding joy in the outdoors and
exploring San Diego via bus rides alongside his doting great-grandmother, “Granny.”

Rynell’s faith was a significant part of his life, a testament to his church visits with Granny. His favorite phrase, “Praise the Lord,” reflected his unwavering belief and gratitude for life’s blessings. The caregivers at DSC, Luis and Arturo, who also resided with him, held a special place in their hearts for him. They accompanied him on field trips, long walks and rides, ensuring all his needs were met, and that Rynell enjoyed every minute of it. His mother, Carmen, kept him well-groomed and handsome, reinforcing the warm, loving environment that Rynell called home.

On October 4, 2023, Rynell passed away peacefully.

Rynell was preceded in death by his grandmother Oxivaner McClure “Candye”, and great-grandmother, Hazel McClure “Granny”.

Left to celebrate and cherish his memory are his parents; Carmen Dukes and Rynell Baker, Sr., his bonus father Sherman Dukes, who provided additional love and support, all of San Diego, his beloved grandmother Lurenette Griffin, grandfather Bonaparte
Baker “Bonay”, his four sisters and four brothers; Isis Williams, Tajjahnee Williams, Sher’cari Dukes, De’Azhae Baker, John Williams III, Ricky Cotton II, and Jaquan Baker of San Diego, CA, and John’ae Williams of San Antonio, TX, his God Mothers; Natarshia Barnes and Utopia Penn, and a host of aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, cousins, and friends.

Rynell’s life was a testament to courage, resilience, and love. He faced his challenges head-on, and his spirited personality brought joy to everyone around him. His memory will forever live on in the hearts of those who loved him. The years we were blessed to have Rynell in our lives may not have been long enough, but we are grateful for every moment we shared with him.

Rest in peace, dear Rynell, until we meet again.


Dr. William Tayari Howard

Dr. William Tayari Howard was born February 1, 1950, in Louisville, Kentucky, to the parents of William John Howard and Dorothy Howard, who preceded him in death.

As a child growing up, Tayari was exposed to radio broadcasting. His parents were radio broadcast pioneers in the 1940’s and 1950’s. Tayari joined the United States Coast Guard in 1971 and moved to San Diego, CA, where he started his radio career in 1972 at Kuumba Time!

Over the years he worked for a variety of radio stations, to include; XHRM-FM 92.5, XHITZ-FM 90.3 Z90, and KIFM Jazz 98.1, where during his tenure, Dr. Howard was the only African American employed.

In 1974, he joined Bethel Baptist Church. In 1975, he married Pamela J. Knox. From this union, two children were born and later, three grandchildren. One of Tayari’s proudest moments was watching both of his daughters continue the family legacy of radio broadcasting. Tayari took pride in, and told everyone he knew, that his daughters worked in the broadcasting industry. His daughter, Summer Howard Johnson, worked for San Diego’s Z90 and Smooth Jazz 98.1. His other daughter, Mercedes Howard, started her broadcasting career as an Airwatch Traffic Reporter for all iHeart Media brands. Mercedes also worked as an “on-air” radio personality for Channel 933, and she currently works for PBS in Colorado at the Drop 104.7. In total, Mercedes has 17 years in broadcast radio!

Tayari had many accomplishments throughout his career, including over 50 years of radio broadcasting in the county of San Diego, the production of over 6,000 radio, television, and public service announcements, and serving 39 consecutive years as the Official Parade Announcer for the San Diego Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Parade. He was the host of more than 7,000 events since 1981, and he served as the host of Lights Out
Lounge and the production of Coffee and Jazz with Tayari, heard over Jazz 98.1 KIFM for sixteen years.

He was a proud graduate of Columbia School of Broadcasting in San Francisco and a Radio, Television, and Film major at San Diego City College. Following his retirement from SDG&E, where he was employed for 25 years, Dr. Howard established the Tayari
Media Group, and later, Dr. Howard received an Honorary Doctor of Humane Letters Degree.

Tayari also had a passion for giving back to his community, especially to his beloved 4th district of San Diego, teaching broadcast media arts and the effects of social media to high school students, and starting his own internet radio website, www.kkssdjazz.com.

As a Christian, Dr. Howard put his faith and trust in the redemptive work of Jesus Christ. Dr. Howard was a member of Eagle’s Nest Christian Center for over 20 years, and served as a Deacon for Eagle’s Nest for over 15 years under the leadership of Dr. Rev. John E. Warren. One of his favorite scriptures was Jeremiah 29:11.

Tayari will be remembered for his love of God and family, hard work and dedication to his community, and the broadcasting industry. He will be sorely missed by all who knew and loved him.

On Friday, October 13, 2023, God called Dr. William Tayari Howard from labor to reward.

He leaves to cherish his loving memory, his former wife and lifelong friend Pamela J. Howard, two daughters; Summer Howard and Mercedes Howard, three living brothers, four living sisters, three grandchildren, and a host of nieces, nephews, and special friends.


Local SDABSW Empowers Black Moms with Mother’s T.E.A.

By VOICE & VIEWPOINT STAFF

In our October 12 issue, we published an article entitled The Neighborhood House Association’s August Infant Care Event, along with photos originally reported to have been taken at an August Neighborhood House Association breastfeeding event.

It has come to our attention that the published photos were actually taken during a San Diego Association of Black Social Workers (SDABSW) event held August 12, 2023, entitled Mother’s T.E.A. (Teach, Empower and Advocate) just prior to Black Breastfeeding Week (August 25th to 31st).

For full article, news, photos and community events pick up our print only issue, published weekly or subscribe online to get full news access. 


‘We all should be worried’: Black Entrepreneurs, Business Leaders Say Conservative Legal Challenges Could Hinder Progress

(CNN) — As a news anchor in New York, Cathleen Trigg-Jones said she experienced firsthand the discrimination women of color face in the male-dominated entertainment industry.

So, in 2019, she made a career pivot and launched iWoman TV — a media company led by women, featuring shows with female leads.

The only problem was she needed money to sustain the business. Trigg-Jones said she applied for funding from grant groups, venture capital funds and investors, but most of them denied her. She said she was told her company wasn’t making enough money and it was too new.

But the Fearless Fund – a Black women-owned venture capitalist firm that invests in women of color – took a chance on Trigg-Jones and her company. In 2022, the group awarded iWoman TV a $20,000 grant, Trigg-Jones said.

The grant allowed her to scale operations and increase funding for female content creators to start or finish films projects.

“Every little bit helps when you’re a Black female trying to start from scratch to build a business in a world that is not designed to see you succeed,” Trigg-Jones said. “The barriers are expansive.”

But the Fearless Fund’s grant program for businesses owned by women of color has recently faced a legal challenge from the American Alliance for Equal Rights (AAER), a conservative group that claims the venture capitalist firm’s grants amount to racial discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1866.

Late last month, a federal appeals court granted the Alliance’s motion to temporarily block the Fearless Fund from awarding grants exclusively to Black women entrepreneurs.

CNN has reached out to the Fearless Fund for comment on the ongoing lawsuit.

The Alliance is led by conservative legal strategist Edward Blum, the same attorney behind the Supreme Court case that dismantled affirmative action in college admissions. In August, Blum also sued two international law firms over their diversity fellowships but dropped one of the lawsuits after the firm decided to open its fellowship to all associates.

In an email, Blum told CNN he believes his legal campaign against affirmative action and grant programs like those offered by the Fearless Fund is ultimately a question of fairness.

“Our nation’s civil rights laws do not permit racial distinctions because some racial groups are overrepresented in various endeavors, while others are under-represented,” Blum said in the email.

The AAER’s legal challenges have left civil rights activists and Black business leaders anticipating the conservative group’s next lawsuit and whether Blum will continue to target programs that exclusively serve people of color.

Black business leaders told CNN the lawsuits, if successful, could stand to undo decades of progress toward leveling the playing field for Black and brown people in the workplace and small business sector.

“It definitely opens up a Pandora’s box,” Trigg-Jones said. “We all should be worried.”

Trigg-Jones said programs such as the Fearless Fund wouldn’t be necessary if there were equal opportunities for Black business owners to obtain funding.

According to a 2019 report from American Express, Black women are the fastest growing demographic of entrepreneurs in the country.

But the intersectionality of being Black and a woman puts the odds against them when it comes to securing finances for those businesses.

Black business owners are turned down for loans at a rate three times higher than White business owners, according to a 2020 analysis of small businesses by Goldman Sachs.

And in 2020, US businesses founded only by women received about 2% of venture capital funding, according to an analysis of female founders and investors in venture capital by PitchBook, an organization that compiles data and research on global capital markets.

“Women of color are the least funded but the most founded,” Fearless Fund co-founder and CEO Arian Simone told CNN last month.

Though he acknowledged the disparities exist, Blum told CNN “venture capital funding gaps between the races is never a legal or moral justification to exclude certain men and women from public programs by race or ethnicity.”

He said AAER “believes it is legally permissible to provide benefits to businesses and individuals who are under-resourced but those benefits must be made available to all races and ethnicities.”

But some Black entrepreneurs insist they need dedicated funding resources to gain equal footing with their White counterparts.

Rashae Barnes, founder of Evals Equity, said she decided to create an investment fund for businesses owned by women of color last year after facing her own roadblocks to entrepreneurship.

Barnes, who owns a public relations firm and a spice company,  said she struggled to gain access to capital because the interest rates for business loans were too high.

With Evals Equity, Barnes said she has been able to raise more than $100,000 and has helped fund more than 40 women of color entrepreneurs. Their businesses have ranged from hair salons and tech companies to tutoring programs.

Barnes also created National Black Funding Day, celebrated on Sept. 30, to raise awareness of the struggles Black entrepreneurs face with funding.

“We just want an equal playing field,” Barnes said. “If we were incorporated in the allocation of funds to begin with … we wouldn’t have to create programs or funds to help people who look like us.”

‘A pin in the progress’

Kaycea Campbell, chair of the economics department at Pierce College Los Angeles, said she expects there will be more legal challenges to diversity initiatives moving forward.

She said the nation’s political and legal landscape is shifting with more Republican lawmakers vilifying diversity, equity and inclusion programs and a conservative majority on the Supreme Court gutting affirmative action.

“There are huge implications for a lot of diversity, equity, inclusion initiatives,” Campbell said. “There is a sense of caution. Companies are worried about being sued or spending money on programs that could later be reversed. So, it has kind of put a pin in the progress.”

The net worth of the typical Black household in 2022 was $44,900, according to the Federal Reserve’s latest Survey of Consumer Finances, a triennial report that provides a comprehensive look at Americans’ financial circumstances.

That’s up more than 61% for Black households since the Fed’s last survey in 2019.

Even with these gains, their net worth remains only a fraction of that of White households, whose median wealth was $285,000 last year, up 31% from 2019, according to the Fed’s survey.

Lenwood Long, president and CEO of the African American Alliance of Community Development Financial Institution CEOs — a national coalition of CEOs of venture capital funds, credit unions and loan funds — said centuries of discrimination and systemic racism has meant Black Americans have long had to fight an uphill battle for economic parity and justice.

Long said Black entrepreneurs often lack the generational wealth that enables people to start businesses without loans. Many also lack the collateral needed to get approved for loans at major financial institutions, he said.

But groups like the Fearless Fund, he said, are helping Black people gain access to capital so they can build that wealth.

Long said the conservative challenges feel like a setback for Black Americans.

“It’s sad and disgraceful and shameful,” he said.

“They are saying you can’t be intentional in directing funds to groups that have been historically denied access to capital and access to education. Those are two areas that will address the racial wealth gap.”

CNN’s Jaide Timm-Garcia, Isabel Rosales and Tami Luhby contributed to this report 


Reports Cast Shadows on the Economic Picture for Black Californians

By Lila Brown, California Black Media

Recent studies suggest that the economic picture for Black Californians is not looking rosy.

Increasingly, the state is becoming more unaffordable for African Americans, leading many families to relocate to less expensive places both within and outside of the borders of the Golden state.

“After pandemic-era declines, California’s poverty rate is on the rise. Expansions to safety net programs during the pandemic reduced poverty substantially, but these expansions had mostly expired by the end of 2022,” reads a report published by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) on Oct. 24.

For Black Californians, the poverty rate at 13.6% is more than double the percentage of African Americans living in California, which currently stands at about 5.8% of the state’s population of nearly 40 million.

“While economic growth throughout 2022 countered some of these program losses — by boosting family resources from work — the state’s overall poverty rate increased from 11.7% in fall 2021 to 13.2% in early 2023,” the PPIC report continued.

The unemployment numbers for Black Californians also remain high – and continue to climb.

According to the Economic Policy Institute, the unemployment rate for Black Californians stands at 7.4%, which is higher than the 4.5% unemployment rate for all racial groups in the state for Q2 2023. This is also higher than the national rate of 5.8%.

In California, the Black-White unemployment rate ratio is at 1.9 to 1. The national Black-White unemployment ratio remained at 2-to-1 in the second quarter of 2023, maintaining the historic trend of Black workers being twice as likely to be unemployed as White workers. There’s nowhere in the country where the unemployment numbers for Black and White workers are equal.

For September, the California Employment Development Department (EDD) reported that unemployment is on the rise. The state’s unemployment rate crept up to 4.7%, an increase of 144,000 people. It is the second highest unemployment rate of any state. The labor force – Californians working or looking for work – also shrank.

Between 2021 to 2022, the overall poverty rate in California rose from 11.0% to 16.4%. This increase can be linked to the high costs of living, inflation, and the end of pandemic-era supports, such as the expanded federal Child Tax Credit and other welfare benefits. While financial assistance cut the poverty rate for Black Californians by three-quarters to 9.5% in 2021, it lessened poverty for Black Californians by well under half the following year, contributing to a near doubling of their poverty rate to 18.6%.

The California Budget Center checking the pulse of households from US Census data showed that more than half (54%) of Black Californians reported facing difficulty paying for essential needs like food and housing.

Los Angeles County (15.5%) and San Diego County (15.0%) had the highest poverty rates. The Central Valley and Sierra region had the lowest (10.7%), largely due to lower housing costs.

In China last week, Gov. Gavin Newsom highlighted the strength of California’s economy, the fifth largest in the world, and President Joe Biden released his Bidenomics report in June highlighting the achievements of his Invest in America plan.

The White House reports that under the Biden-Harris Administration, Black Americans have experienced their lowest unemployment rate on record and the highest employment rate since November 2000. The participation of Black workers in the labor force has also reached its highest level since August 2008. There has been reduction in the Black child poverty rate by greater than 12%, impacting over 200,000 children, through the Thrifty Food Plan.

Most reports point to signs that the nation is currently at pre-pandemic levels and California has recovered its pandemic-induced job losses in June 2022, according to the latest California Labor Market Review released in August. However, those numbers indicating the state economy is strong and stabilizing contrast with the harsh realities confronting many Black Californians struggling every day to make ends meet. A study by the Urban Institute released in September shines light on the complex challenges Black Californians face as more of them make the decision to relocate to less expensive areas in the state, mostly driven by a combination of economic factors like housing unaffordability, rolling layoffs, rising inflation, an increase in renter evictions and stagnant salaries.

The report indicates that, “Over the last decade, several factors have contributed to many Black residents relocating from urban epicenters to the suburbs of metropolitan areas and to smaller, less dense, less populous cities.”

“This has been the reality of many Black Californians: as the Black populations of San Francisco and Alameda counties drop, those of Contra Costa and Sacramento rise. As Los Angeles sees its share of Black residents decline, neighboring Riverside and San Bernardino shares increase,” that report further highlights.

Lisa D. Cook, Governor of the Federal Reserve Board, says unemployment lies at the root of all America’s social problems and pushing for maximum employment for all Americans is the solution to minimizing poverty. Cook made the point while accepting the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies’ Louis E. Martin Award on Oct. 18 in Washington, D.C.

“Maximum employment boosts long-run economic potential. It means that a vital resource is being used productively. A strong labor market increases labor force participation and the willingness of firms to recruit and upgrade the skills of workers,” cook stated. She explained that the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978, also known as the Humphrey-Hawkins Act, set economic priorities for the federal government centered on promoting good-paying jobs for all Americans.

“Maximum employment also promotes business investment that boosts productivity and long-run economic potential. And the full participation of all segments of society should be expected to result in more ideas, including more diverse ideas, more invention, and more innovation,” Cook concluded


White Americans Have Far More Wealth than Black Americans. Here’s How Big the Gap Is

(CNN) — Although Black and Hispanic Americans have accumulated more wealth in recent years, their median net worth still lags far behind that of White Americans.

The net worth of the typical Black and Hispanic household in 2022 was $44,900 and about $61,600, respectively, according to the Federal Reserve’s latest Survey on Consumer Finances, a triennial report released this month that provides a comprehensive look at Americans’ financial circumstances.

That’s up more than 61% for Black households and 47% for Hispanic households since the Fed’s last survey in 2019.

Even with these gains, their wealth remains only a fraction of that of White households, whose median wealth was $285,000 last year, up 31% from 2019.

Asian Americans had the highest median net worth at $536,000, the first year their wealth was broken out in the survey. Edward Wolff, a professor of economics at New York University, said Asian Americans have higher incomes and much lower poverty rates than White Americans, which drives up their median wealth.

The growth in wealth for typical Black and Hispanic households provides them more financial stability, Ana Hernández Kent, senior researcher at the Institute for Economic Equity at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, said on October 20.

This means “these families are better able to weather a future downturn,” she said. “So, it’s extremely positive.”

Overall, however, Kent called the changes in wealth between 2019 and 2022 “a mixed bag” because of the “incredible amount of wealth inequality in the US.”

Record wealth levels

The median wealth of White and Black Americans has now surpassed their earlier peaks, which were prior to the Great Recession, Wolff said.

Hispanic households’ median net worth had already hit a record in 2019 and has since continued to rise.

The growth in housing wealth – a home’s market value minus any outstanding mortgages or loans secured by the home – has fueled the overall rise in net worth among Black and Hispanic Americans, in particular, according to the Fed survey.

Soaring home prices in recent years have boosted homeowners’ equity. Meanwhile, Wolff said, higher inflation also helped increase the net worth of Black and Hispanic households.

Net worth consists of assets minus debts, so if the value of someone’s debt declines, their net worth increases.

Black and Hispanic households typically have larger mortgages and because the value of their debt declined after adjusting for inflation between 2019 and 2022, their wealth increased, Wolff said.

“It’s really a combination of rising house prices and the high mortgage debt of Black and Hispanic families that has led to greater growth in their wealth than White families,” he said.

Meanwhile, Black Americans have made strides in home ownership since 2013, though their rate remains below where it was in 2007, before the Great Recession led to many people losing their property. The home ownership rate for Hispanic Americans grew between 2019 and 2022 and now exceeds what it was in 2007.

The share of White Americans owning homes remained essentially flat between 2019 and 2022 and has yet to surpass its 2007 rate.

In addition, larger shares of Black and Hispanic households owned stock and businesses in 2022, positioning them to keep better pace with White households when the value of these assets rise, according to the survey.

These increases in asset ownership helped modestly narrow the wealth gap ratio between White Americans and Black and Hispanic Americans between 2019 and 2022.

In 2022, the typical White household had about six times as much wealth as the typical Black household and five times as much as the typical Hispanic household.

That’s an improvement from 2016, when White Americans had 10 times the wealth of Black Americans and about eight times that of Hispanic Americans.

Still, these gains are tempered by the fact that the wealth gap widened by about $50,000 when comparing the net worth of White Americans in 2022 with that of Black and Hispanic Americans in dollars.

Income picture is gloomier

While Americans grew more wealthy in recent years, their income has essentially stagnated.

Median income rose by 1.3% for White households, while it slipped 1.6% and 1.1% for the Black and Hispanic households, respectively, between 2019 and 2022.

Looking ahead, Americans generally are more pessimistic about the future. The share of Black and Hispanic Americans who say they are uncertain about their income next year grew by 14.2 percentage points and 10.9 percentage points, respectively. Among White households, the increase in uncertainty about their income in the next year rose by 7 percentage points.

What’s more, the share of households that expect the economy to get worse over the next five years is at or near record highs across all groups.

“The recent improvements in wealth ratios across races is promising, but families’ increased financial uncertainty suggests continued improvements may not persist in the future,” the Fed concluded.


From the Desk of the Editor 11/1/23

ARVE Error: No attachment with that ID

U.S. Supreme Court Grapples with Social Media Boundaries for Public Officials

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

The U.S. Supreme Court plans to deliberate on two pivotal cases that could redefine the boundaries of state action within social media. Lindke v. Freed and O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier attempts to address whether a public official’s social media presence can be considered an extension of their governmental role and if blocking individuals from personal accounts constitutes a First Amendment violation.

During his presidency, Donald Trump was sued, and the courts ruled against him. The reason was that he frequently used his Twitter account to make official announcements. But that lawsuit was tossed out once he left office in January 2021. Twitter initially disabled Trump’s account, but Elon Musk, the new owner, later decided to reverse this decision as part of a major overhaul that included renaming the social media site to X.

In Lindke v. Freed, the central issue is whether a public official’s social media activity can be categorized as state action only when the account is used to perform a governmental duty or done under the authority of their office. The question strikes at the heart of the evolving digital communication landscape, where public officials increasingly utilize platforms like Twitter and Facebook to engage with constituents and disseminate official information.

According to Harvard Law Today, the case involves John Freed, the city manager of Port Huron, Michigan, who regularly used the Facebook page he first created as a college student to share a mix of news ranging from the opening of a new city playground to updates about his home improvement projects. “When Port Huron resident Kevin Lindke commented negatively on one of his photos in March 2020, Freed deleted Lindke’s remarks and blocked him from accessing the page,” Harvard Law Today reported.
The second case arose in Poway, California, where two school board members, Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff, and T.J. Zane, blocked two local parents, Christopher, and Kimberly Garnier, from their social media accounts, which they too had created prior to taking office.

“In both cases, the aggrieved constituents sued under a federal law — Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code — which requires that people acting on behalf of the government must not deprive anyone ‘of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution,’” Harvard Law Today noted. But the separate appeals courts hearing the two cases rendered opposing judgments, relying on different analyses.

Now, the high court faces the issue of how to deal with questions pertaining to the personal social media pages of public officials. Appeals courts have already determined that when public officials create an online place for public comments, the First Amendment’s freedom of speech prevents those officials from blocking people whose comments they don’t like.

“Does the local government own the social media account?” posited Amanda Karras, general counsel of the International Municipal Lawyers Association. “Does it authorize or require creation of the account, and does the account utilize government resources?”
Countering that argument, Lindke’s lawyer, Allon Kedem, said public officials can’t block critics. “One of the key aspects of this case is that Mr. Freed was talking to the public as a city manager,” Kedem said. Freed was “essentially performing his job by answering their questions about the services that the city was providing,” Kedem asserted.
The Supreme Court hearings for both cases begin on November 6.


President Biden Takes Bold Action with Landmark Executive Order on AI Regulation

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

President Joe Biden has issued a sweeping executive order to safeguard against potential threats posed by artificial intelligence (AI). The order, announced on Monday, seeks to prevent the misuse of AI technology for developing destructive weapons or launching highly potent cyberattacks.

The move marks a significant step by the federal government into the burgeoning half-trillion-dollar AI industry, a sector dominated by industry giants including Google and Amazon. The executive order also calls on Congress to pass data privacy legislation, a long-pursued goal facing numerous obstacles over the years.

The order introduces a range of regulations, including oversight over safety tests conducted by companies to evaluate AI-powered systems like conversation bots, such as ChatGPT. Additionally, it mandates industry standards like watermarks for identifying AI-driven products.

Vice President Kamala Harris emphasized the ethical responsibility of leaders from government, civil society, and the private sector to ensure that AI is harnessed in a way that safeguards the public and maximizes its benefits.
“We have a moral, ethical, and societal duty to make sure that AI is adopted and advanced in a way that protects the public from potential harm and ensures that everyone is able to enjoy its benefits,” Harris stated.

Biden and Harris have previously worked on the “Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights,” which involved consultations with various experts, spanning computer scientists, civil rights leaders, legal scholars, and business figures. The aim was to ensure the equitable distribution of AI benefits and address potential challenges like algorithmic bias, data privacy violations, and deep fakes.
Biden highlighted the immense technological transformation expected in the next few years, especially in AI. He underscored the profound impact AI is already having in various aspects of daily life, from weather prediction to optimizing commute routes.

“We’re going to see more technological change in the next 10—maybe the next five years—than we’ve seen in the last 50 years, and that’s a fact,” Biden asserted. “And it’s the most consequential technology of our time. Artificial intelligence is accelerating that change. It’s going to accelerate it at warp speed.”

However, the President also acknowledged the potential downsides, particularly in instances where AI is used to exploit personal data and make social media platforms more addictive, which can have detrimental effects on mental health.

To mitigate the risks, the executive order outlines key measures:
1. AI Safety and Security: The Defense Production Act will be invoked to ensure companies demonstrate the safety of their most powerful AI systems before deployment. This involves rigorous testing and sharing independent results to verify they pose no national security or safety risks.
2. Trust and Transparency: The Department of Commerce will establish standards for watermarking and labeling AI-generated content, aiming to distinguish it from authentic content. This measure intends to combat the spread of deep fakes and disinformation.
3. Privacy Protection: The order calls for enhanced protections for personal data in the age of AI. It also addresses concerns about discrimination and bias, ensuring fairness in AI applications, particularly in housing, benefits, and employment decisions.
4. Consumer and Worker Safeguards: The order aims to ensure emerging AI technologies benefit consumers and workers alike. This includes leveraging AI for more effective and affordable healthcare solutions while implementing safeguards to prevent harm. It also calls for a comprehensive report on the potential impact of AI on the labor market.
5. Global Leadership and Collaboration: The administration aims to maintain American leadership in AI innovation and collaborate with international partners to establish guidelines for responsible AI development.

Biden emphasized the importance of congressional action to complement the executive order’s initiatives. He urged legislation to regulate Big Tech’s collection of personal data, particularly from children and teenagers online.

“We face a genuine inflection point in history, one of those moments where the decisions we make in the very near term are going to set the course for the next decades. And with the position we lead the world, the toughest challenges are the greatest opportunities,” the president continued. “Look, there’s no greater change that I can think of in my life than AI presents as a potential: exploring the universe, fighting climate change, ending cancer as we know it, and so much more. As artificial intelligence expands the boundary of human possibility and tests the bounds of human understanding, this landmark executive order is a testament to what we stand for: safety, security, trust, openness, American leadership, and the undeniable rights endowed by our Creator that no creator — no creation can take away.”


Gender Disparities in High School Graduation Rates: Unearthing Root Causes and Seeking Solutions

0

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

In communities across America, the disparity in high school graduation rates between Black students and their counterparts of other racial backgrounds has long been a point of concern. Officials and activists have identified the deeply rooted issue of excessive student suspension as a significant contributing factor. The systemic problem not only hampers the immediate educational prospects of affected students but also casts a long shadow over their prospects as Black Americans.

However, a report in the Associated Press explored a less explored facet of the educational divide emerges when examining the gender gap within these communities. While boys and girls attend the same classes, have access to identical programs, and often come from the same families, girls consistently outperform boys in public high schools nationwide. This gender disparity mirrors the achievement gap between students from affluent and low-income families, an issue that educational officials have closely monitored for years.

According to researchers, the reasons behind this discrepancy are multifaceted. One factor that emerges prominently is that boys are also more susceptible to disciplinary measures, including suspensions, which can lead to falling off track. Moreover, they are less likely to seek help when facing mental health challenges.

Research found that some boys initially find steady employment upon dropping out, but the long-term consequences of lacking a high school degree are stark. Recent studies reveal that young men who leave high school prematurely earn less over their lifetimes and are more likely to end up in the criminal justice system.

Despite this, the U.S. government does not mandate states to report graduation data by gender, in contrast to the requirements for reporting data by racial and ethnic groups, as well as for children with disabilities, English language learners, and homeless students.

Nevertheless, the Associated Press reported that researcher Richard Reeves, who based on data available from 37 reporting states, estimated that over 45,000 fewer boys than girls graduated high school in 2018. That year, approximately 88% of girls graduated on time compared to 82% of boys.

The gender gap in graduation rates persisted at six percentage points in 2021, according to a follow-up analysis. The gap has largely evaded comprehensive attention from schools, though some have implemented effective strategies. Yonkers, New York, for instance, improved graduation rates for boys of color through mentoring programs. Former Superintendent Edwin Quezada highlighted the need to address the racial gap in graduation rates as a crucial step toward comprehending the broader gender gap, which stood at seven percentage points in 2022.

Quezada told the news outlet that boys are referred to special education at higher rates than girls in early grades and are suspended more frequently throughout their school years. These factors, he noted, can significantly impede progress toward on-time graduation. “When the decks are stacked differently for young men than they are for young ladies, why should we expect different outcomes?” he questioned.

To support boys’ success, school policies in Buffalo have incorporated initiatives from the “My Brother’s Keeper” program. The district has also partnered with the education advocacy group “Say Yes Buffalo” to offer mentoring to male students and to recruit male teachers. Despite these efforts, the urban district reported a 10-point graduation gender gap in 2022 (84%–74%) and an 11-point gap (84%–73%) in 2021.

Research from Buffalo’s spokesman, Jeffrey Hammond, indicates that girls excel nationally in school over boys due to their propensity to plan, set academic goals, and invest effort in achieving them. He added that girls receive fewer school suspensions, demonstrating that they are generally more likely to follow the rules and receive more personalized instruction from teachers.

Though straightforward strides have been made, understanding the precise interplay between race and the gender gap remains a challenge, with only ten states reporting graduation rates breaking it down by both gender and race.

The graduation gender gap “is harder to explain than some of the other disparities we see,” Population Reference Bureau’s Beth Jarosz told the Associated Press. “We know that structural racism is part of the explanation for why Black youth and Hispanic, Latino youth and American Indian youth are less likely to graduate. But it’s not a structural racism issue for boys versus girls,” she said.


The Future Looks Bright for Hoover Football Representatives

By Darrel Wheeler, Contributing Writer

The new-look Hoover High School football Cardinals completed their season with a 31-0 shut down win over rivals Crawford High in what was billed as the Battle of the Boulevard.

Under the direction of brand new Head Coach Danial White the Cardinals finished the exciting season including four shutout victories 7-2 their best finish in many moon’s.

Coach Danial and staff have created a winning environment with new attitudes, accountability, a sense of purpose and some fun. 

For full article, news, photos and community events pick up our print only issue, published weekly or subscribe online to get full news access. 


Common Ground Theatre Announces the Return of a Holiday Favorite The Black Nativity

By VOICE & VIEWPOINT NEWSWIRE

Common Ground Theatre (CGT) will present a holiday favorite, The Black Nativity, based loosely on the Langston Hughes classic of the same name. The play, centered around the Christmas story, is full of music and some very special guest participants. CGT’s Executive Artistic Director, Yolanda Franklin, is taking the production to new heights with the incorporation of local pastors to deliver the Christmas message. The show will run for two weekends beginning December 1 at the Educational Cultural Complex Theater, 4343 Ocean View Boulevard, San Diego, CA 92113. This is a play for the entire family, and it is one you won’t want to miss.

The featured Pastors include:

OPENING WEEKEND:
Date: Friday, December 1, 7:30pm
Pastor: Nate Stewart
Church: Greater Life Church, San Diego

Date: Saturday, December 2, 7:30pm
Pastor: Bishop William Benson
West Coast Regional Administrative Bishop
Church: Total Deliverance Worship Center

Date: Sunday, December 3, 2pm
Pastor Dr. Kevin E. Stafford
Church: Calvary Baptist Church

CLOSING WEEKEND:
Date: Friday, December 8, 7:30pm
Pastor Terry Wayne Brooks
Church: Bayview Church, San Diego

Saturday, December 9, 7:30pm
Pastor Gwendolyn Brooks
Church: Open Door Family Worship Center

style=”font-weight: 400;”>Date: Sunday, December 10, 2pm
Pastor: Glenn McKinney
Church: St. Stephens Church of God in Christ

Tickets are available at www.commongroundtheatre.org beginning November 1, 2023. Tickets are $40 General Admission and $35 for Seniors and students with ID.

Take advantage of the early bird special, this production will sell out quickly. Tickets purchased on or before November 15 will be $30 each.

For more information, contact Francine DeWitt Haynes via email at [email protected] or call 619-246-5350.


Accessibility Toolbar

Unlike many news organizations, Voice & Viewpoint delivers content that matters to you. Help us keep it that way by making a generous donation for as low as $2. Your support will fund local, investigative journalism for the community, by the community.

© The San Diego Voice and Viewpoint

Submit Community News Advertise Contact Us Subscribe Our Team Privacy Policy