Home Blog Page 269

Baltimore Squeegee Worker on Trial for Murder Acted in Self-Defense in Motorist’s Death, Lawyer says

0

BALTIMORE (AP) — A Baltimore teenager acted in self-defense when he allegedly shot and killed a baseball bat-wielding driver who approached youths washing windshields at a busy downtown intersection last summer, attorneys for the teen argued as his murder trial got underway Tuesday.

The high-profile tragedy reignited longstanding debate about Baltimore’s squeegee workers, mostly Black youths from disadvantaged backgrounds looking to make fast cash. City leaders have since banned the practice at certain high-traffic intersections and stepped up efforts to connect squeegee workers with above-board job opportunities.

“The state would have you believe this case is about squeegee boys,” defense attorney J. Wyndal Gordon told jurors in his opening statement. “This case is about road rage.”

Timothy Reynolds, 48, died from gunshot wounds after the July 2022 confrontation in evening rush hour near Baltimore’s Inner Harbor. An engineer and father of three, he grew up in the Baltimore area and was an avid fan of the city’s major league sports teams.

Defense attorneys argued Reynolds was the aggressor, his anger fueled by a longstanding irritation with squeegee workers whose presence at downtown intersections dates back decades.

“Mr. Reynolds’ personal views triggered him, and it led to an unprovoked attack on children,” Gordon said. “He took the law into his own hands and it ended poorly for him.”

But prosecutors gave jurors a different narrative of the moments preceding Reynolds’ death.

“He was out-maneuvered and he was gunned down,” prosecutor Cynthia Banks said, counting off the five gunshots that wounded him, including three to his back. “You cannot overlook the fact that Mr. Reynolds was shot dead.”

In turn, prosecutors told the jury that something got under Reynolds’ skin that afternoon and elicited a strong reaction. “The fact is he was upset, he was mad, he was human,” Banks said.

It’s not clear exactly what caused Reynolds to confront the squeegee workers he encountered. But he drove through the intersection and parked his car haphazardly, grabbed a metal baseball bat from the trunk and marched across several lanes of traffic toward the group, according to court testimony.

His mother was among several relatives who sat through Tuesday’s proceedings, her face twisting with grief during testimony about the minute details of the shooting.

The defendant, who faces first-degree murder and other charges, turned 15 the day after the shooting. He’s being tried in adult court, but The Associated Press is withholding his name because he’s a minor.

His attorneys repeatedly emphasized the difference in size between the defendant and Reynolds, who was 6 foot 3 (1.9 meters) tall and over 300 pounds (135 kilograms).

“You know who the adult was? Mr. Reynolds,” Gordon said, arguing Reynolds wasn’t acting his age.

One of the witnesses who testified Tuesday was a UPS driver who happened to pass through the intersection when the confrontation occurred. He said Reynolds swung the bat toward one squeegee worker moments before another opened fire. He said he couldn’t tell whether Reynolds struck anyone with the bat and couldn’t hear any words exchanged.

No witnesses positively identified the defendant as the shooter, saying they couldn’t be sure about his appearance because he was wearing a facemask. Multiple witnesses said they thought the shooter was wearing a pink shirt at the time.

Police later found a backpack nearby that contained a loaded handgun.

Another witness testified she was sitting in her car outside a nearby apartment building that evening when she saw a young man take off a pink shirt and don a mask that covered most of his face. She also said she couldn’t positively identify the defendant.

The teen appeared in court Tuesday wearing a gray suit, his shackles clanking loudly as he entered the room. His attorneys acknowledged he looked visibly older than when he was arrested last summer: taller and broader with facial hair beginning to come in.

“Some people would have you believe his name is squeegee worker, but he has a real name. He’s a real human being,” Gordon told the jury, saying his client dreamed of becoming an engineer or lawyer someday.

The attorney’s comments alluded to the heated debate around squeegee work that has long divided Baltimoreans. To some, the windshield washers are hard-working entrepreneurs facing some of Baltimore’s most deep-seated social challenges, including poverty, racism and disinvestment in communities of color; others consider them a nuisance and public safety hazard.

Since the city launched a campaign to address squeegeeing in response to the shooting, squeegee workers have been few and far between at most downtown intersections and officials have reported increased numbers of them taking advantage of social services and job-placement programs.

The trial is set to continue Wednesday in Baltimore Circuit Court.


Biden Administration Takes Action to Increase Transparency and Eliminate Hidden Rental Fees

0

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

Seeking to promote transparency and fairness for renters, major online real-estate marketplaces have joined the Biden administration’s initiative to crack down on hidden apartment rental fees.

Companies such as Zillow, Apartments.com, and AffordableHousing.com have pledged to incorporate previously hidden costs, like application and convenience fees, into their upfront advertised pricing.

Acknowledging the need for clarity on additional charges that renters often face when securing an apartment, the administration’s call for transparency has garnered support from prominent rental platforms.

Administration officials noted in a Fact Sheet that they know that many tenants have been surprised when encountering hidden fees amounting to hundreds of dollars during the application and finalization of rental agreements.

The White House further highlighted potential surprise fees that renters might encounter after securing their apartments, including convenience fees for online rent payment, fees for mail sorting, and unexplained “January fees” added at the start of a new year.
In response to these concerns, the administration has focused on tackling these so-called “junk fees.”

As part of the latest measures announced on Wednesday, July 19, prospective renters can now expect a more straightforward rental process on three major platforms – Zillow, Apartments.com, and AffordableHousing.com.

These marketplaces will display the total cost of apartments, encompassing all associated fees, unlike the previous practice of revealing only the base rent.
The White House said the change should offer a more accurate representation of the financial commitment of renting, providing renters with better tools to make informed decisions.

“At the front end of the apartment search, people often pay application fees of $50, $60, $100 or more per apartment, and have to do it many times over,” a White House official stated.

“If they’re applying to multiple units, this can add up to hundreds of dollars.”
By exposing hidden fees and encouraging transparency, the administration hopes to empower renters to make more informed choices and foster a fairer rental market.
“Reducing housing costs is central to Bidenomics, and recent data show that inflation in rental housing is abating,” White House officials stated.

“Moreover, experts predict that roughly 1 million new apartments will be built this year, increasing supply that will further increase affordability.
“The actions announced today will help renters understand these fees and the full price they can expect to pay, and create additional competition housing providers to reduce reliance on hidden fees.”


Investigation into Tupac Shakur’s Unsolved Killing Resurrected

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

Authorities in Nevada have rekindled the investigation into the unsolved murder of rap legend Tupac Shakur, nearly three decades after his tragic death.

Law enforcement officials disclosed that they executed a search warrant earlier this week, breathing new life into the quest for justice surrounding the rap star’s shooting.
The resurgence of the case follows the June announcement by federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of New York, revealing charges against a third individual in the 2002 shooting death of Run-DMC star Jam Master Jay.

Authorities in New York said the indictment of Jay Bryant, 49, marked a significant breakthrough in the case involving the late Jason Mizell, professionally known as Jam Master Jay.

Bryant’s indictment builds upon the prior charges against Ronald Washington and Karl Jordan Jr. in August 2020, as authorities said they have tirelessly pursued leads to unravel the mystery behind the murder of the influential hip-hop icon.
Tragically, Jay was shot in the head in his recording studio in Jamaica, New York, on October 30, 2002.

His death, occurring several years after the murders of Shakur and the Notorious B.I.G., also sent shockwaves through the music industry.
Meanwhile, in connection with the murder of Shakur, fatally shot on September 7, 1996, Las Vegas police confirmed they executed a search warrant on July 17.

Executed in the nearby city of Henderson, the new warrant has left the public curious about the nature of the search and the specific locations involved.
A police spokesperson refrained from providing additional details regarding the recent progress in the case, including the potential identification of a suspect.

The 25-year-old rapper was traveling in a black BMW driven by Marion “Suge” Knight, the founder of Death Row Records, as part of a convoy of about ten cars, supposedly en route to a nightclub following the Mike Tyson versus Bruce Seldon championship fight at the MGM Grand.

The police confirmed that no other occupants were in the car at the time.
At an intersection near the Las Vegas Strip, while the BMW sat at a red light, a white Cadillac carrying four individuals pulled up alongside it.
That’s when one of the occupants opened fire, unleashing a barrage of bullets into the passenger side of Knight’s car.
Sitting in the passenger seat, Shakur sustained four gunshot wounds, at least two of which hit his chest.

A bullet fragment grazed Knight himself or shrapnel from the vehicle.
Following the attack, Shakur was rushed to a hospital, where he battled for six days before succumbing to his injuries.


January 6 Indictment Looms as Former President Trump Faces Mounting Legal Woes

0

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

Former President Donald Trump, already indicted on state criminal charges in New York and federal crimes in Florida, is facing another legal challenge.

Trump confirmed on Tuesday that he had been served a “target letter” from the special counsel, Jack Smith, in connection with the ongoing criminal investigation into his attempts to cling to power after losing the 2020 election.
The New York Times reported that the letter indicates that Trump is likely to be indicted in the case, raising the stakes of his already tumultuous legal battles.

This marks the second time Smith has identified Trump as a target in a federal investigation, following the initial notice in June, which was related to the inquiry into Trump’s handling of national defense material after leaving office and his alleged obstruction of efforts to retrieve it.
The former president was charged with 37 criminal counts encompassing seven violations of federal law, some in conjunction with one of his aides.

He’s also awaiting a decision in Georgia, where prosecutors have empaneled a Grand Jury to look at Trump’s alleged attempts to influence the 2020 election in the Peach State.
Taking to his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump expressed his displeasure with the latest developments, blaming “Deranged Jack Smith,” the prosecutor from Joe Biden’s Department of Justice, for giving him only four days to report to the Grand Jury.

In his post, Trump implied that such short notice likely points toward an imminent arrest and indictment.
The news of this letter came to light following an inquiry into whether Trump had been informed about being a target in the investigation.

Sources close to Trump confirmed to the New York Times that he received the letter, but they anticipate that the former president would decline the invitation to appear before the grand jury.
The specific aspect of Smith’s investigation that could lead to Trump’s indictment remains unclear.

The probe has delved into a range of strategies that Trump and his allies employ to resist defeat, with at least two grand juries investigating his efforts to retain power.
Recent appearances by key figures in the Trump camp have shed light on the investigation’s scope.

The Times reported that Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, appeared before one of the grand juries in June.
Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s former personal lawyer, also had a recent interview with prosecutors.

According to the Times, key areas of focus for prosecutors include assessing Trump’s state of mind and examining efforts to fundraise based on his false claims of widespread voter fraud.

Further, prosecutors scrutinize whether he was aware of his electoral defeat and explore attempts to assemble fake electors to cast ballots supporting Trump during the electoral college certification.

After the 2020 election, Trump spent several weeks publicly insisting on his victory and exploring avenues to remain in power, including contemplating using government resources to seize voting machines.

The pinnacle of the aftermath was the January 6, 2021, rally near the White House, where he encouraged his supporters to march on the Capitol while the electoral victory of Joe Biden was being certified.
The ensuing chaos saw a mob storm the Capitol building, with some members of the mob even calling for the deaths of Vice President Mike Pence and Speaker Nancy Pelosi.


New Super PAC Aims to Empower Black Voters and Secure House Leadership

0

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

To bolster Black voter participation and secure a groundbreaking achievement in House leadership, a prominent ally of the Congressional Black Caucus is launching a super PAC with ambitious plans to spend tens of millions of dollars.
The newly formed organization, called the Rolling Sea Action Fund, will focus on mobilizing Black voters and aiding Democrats in flipping the House majority.

The ultimate goal is to elect the first Black speaker of the House.
Niccara Campbell-Wallace, former political director of the Congressional Black Caucus PAC, is heading the initiative.

While the Rolling Sea Action Fund will be aligned with the all-Democratic Congressional Black Caucus, it will operate as a “hybrid PAC.”
This designation permits the group to raise candidates’ funds while maintaining a separate account to spend unlimited sums on advertisements and other election-related expenses.

To seize the House majority, Democrats must flip five seats during next year’s congressional elections.
If achieved, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries could become the nation’s first Black speaker of the House.

In an NBC interview before the launch of the Rolling Sea Action Fund, Campbell-Wallace expressed confidence in the group’s ability to execute a multipronged strategy in 2024 with an expenditure exceeding $10 million.
This strategy includes advertising campaigns, in-person organizing, and engagement in crucial communities.

The PAC will concentrate its efforts on districts with more than 8% Black voting age population, mainly focusing on the most competitive House seats.
Campbell-Wallace also indicated the possibility of the group’s involvement in primary races.
“We know that Black voters are the cornerstone of the Democratic Party and of protecting

American democracy,” Campbell-Wallace told NBC.
She further stressed that the initiative would consistently empower and mobilize Black voters, ensuring representation and inclusivity in American politics.
The Congressional Black Caucus comprises several newer members who recently won tightly contested races.

The members include Emilia Sykes of Ohio, Don Davis of North Carolina, Lauren Underwood of Illinois, Jahana Hayes of Connecticut, Lucy McBath of Georgia, Colin Allred of Texas, and Steven Horsford of Nevada.
Meanwhile, Republicans have also tried to diversify their roster of House candidates, with candidates of color and women contributing to their success in the 2020 House races.

NBC News noted that, despite Black voters’ overwhelming support for Democrats, recent polling indicates a slight decline in the party’s image among this demographic.
Campbell-Wallace believes the Rolling Sea Action Fund’s “always-on” approach will help maintain Black voter engagement.

She pointed to President Joe Biden’s and Vice President Kamala Harris’ initiatives on unemployment, infrastructure, and student loans, as well as their significance as representatives for their communities.
While the group’s primary focus is reclaiming the House majority and electing Hakeem Jeffries as speaker, Campbell-Wallace acknowledged the underrepresentation of Black women in the Senate.

She further highlighted the pursuits of Congressional Black Caucus members running for higher offices, such as California Rep. Barbara Lee’s bid for the Senate.
Campbell-Wallace left the matter open when asked about potential involvement in primary races, stating, “We’ll see.”


Rev. Jesse Jackson’s Extraordinary Career in Negotiating for the Release of American Hostages Abroad

0

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

Rev. Jesse Jackson’s decision to step down as president and CEO of the Rainbow PUSH Coalition this month has led many to reflect on the civil rights leader’s astonishing career.
But a significant part of Jackson’s fight for justice was his ability as a deft negotiator.
That was no more evident than when Jackson distinguished himself as a diplomat.

Beyond his efforts on American soil, he played a pivotal role in securing the release of numerous American hostages held captive abroad.
His unwavering commitment to justice and diplomacy has saved lives and earned him global recognition as a skilled negotiator.

One of the most notable instances of Jackson’s intervention occurred in 1985 during the hijacking of TWA Flight 847.
En route from Cairo to San Diego, Hezbollah militants seized the aircraft and took 153 passengers hostage, including 40 Americans.

Prior to the TWA Flight 847 crisis, Jackson previously negotiated with Syrian officials for the release of a captured American airman, and several Cuban political prisoners.
In each instance, President Ronald Reagan sharply criticized Jackson for interfering with foreign matters.

However, having developed a reputation in conflict resolution, Jackson swiftly embarked on a diplomatic mission to Lebanon.
In a daring move, he met with Hezbollah leaders and engaged them in intensive negotiations.

Jackson’s empathetic approach and genuine concern for the hostages’ welfare allowed him to establish a rapport with the captors.
He also demonstrated his commitment to addressing the broader political grievances in the region, which resonated with the militants.

After several days of intense discussions, Jackson’s efforts bore fruit, and the militants agreed to release some of the hostages.
Although the release of the remaining captives took longer, his perseverance and determination ultimately led to their safe return home.
The TWA Flight 847 crisis’s successful resolution earned him praise from the American public and international leaders.

Another landmark hostage negotiation led by Jackson occurred in 1999 when Serbian forces captured three American service members during the Kosovo conflict.
Jackson traveled to Belgrade, Serbia, to talk with the Serbian leadership.

Despite the tense and complex political climate, he skillfully navigated through diplomatic obstacles and pressed for the service members’ release.
Jackson’s unyielding dedication and tenacious spirit in fighting for the hostages’ freedom were instrumental in securing their safe return.

His intervention highlighted the importance of dialogue and diplomacy in resolving international crises.
“I stood ready to do whatever I could within the bounds of the moral and legal law to help,” Jackson insisted.

In 2017, Jackson announced that he had Parkinson’s disease, an illness caused by certain nerve cells breaking down and consequently reduces the amount of chemical, dopamine, that sends signals to the part of the brain that controls movement.
The disease affects about 60,000 Americans each year, and afflicts as many as 10 million globally.

Diagnosed in 2015, Jackson determined to work through his illness before publicly announcing it two years later.
Still, his efforts have saved lives and contributed to the global perception of America as a country that values peaceful resolution over aggression.

“Recognition of the effects of this disease on me has been painful, and I have been slow to grasp the gravity of it,” he said after publicly announcing his illness.
“A Parkinson’s diagnosis is not a stop sign but rather a signal that I must make lifestyle changes and dedicate myself to physical therapy in hopes of slowing the disease’s progression.”


Trump and Allies Plan to Expand Presidential Power in Potential 2025 White House Return

0

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

Former President Donald Trump and his allies are reportedly laying the groundwork for a significant expansion of presidential authority if he returns to the White House in 2025.
According to details published in the New York Times, the proposed changes aim to reshape the executive branch’s structure, directly centralizing greater authority into Trump’s hands.
The Times cited campaign policy proposals and interviews with close associates.

The newspaper said Trump’s ambitions extend beyond recent statements about ordering a criminal investigation into his political rival, President Joe Biden, indicating a willingness to end the long-standing norm of Justice Department independence from White House political influence.

The Trump plan includes bringing independent agencies like the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) under direct presidential control.
These agencies, responsible for regulating television and internet companies and enforcing consumer protection rules, would be subject to Trump’s oversight if his vision became a reality.

Additionally, Trump plans to revive the practice of “impounding” funds, refusing to spend money that Congress has allocated for programs he opposes.
This tactic, previously banned under President Richard Nixon, could be resurrected to grant the president more control over the budgetary process.

Moreover, Trump reportedly intends to strip employment protections from tens of thousands of career civil servants, making it easier to replace individuals he perceives as obstacles to his agenda.
The report stated that this move could lead to a significant reshuffling of personnel within the government.

Trump and his advisers are not shying away from discussing their intentions openly.
They have been proclaiming their agenda during rallies and on the campaign website, and they’ve described their plans in white papers and public discussions.
Russell T. Vought, who previously ran the Office of Management and Budget in the Trump administration, explained their strategy to the Times.

“What we’re trying to do is identify the pockets of independence and seize them,” he said.
The underpinning legal theory behind their efforts is known as the “unitary executive theory,” which rejects the traditional view of the government as composed of three separate branches with checks and balances.

Instead, the theory argues that the Constitution grants the president complete control of the executive branch, thus limiting Congress’s ability to empower agency heads or restrict the president’s authority.
If Trump were to secure a second term, his expansive vision of power could come to fruition, considering he now benefits from a well-funded policymaking infrastructure.

Former officials who remained loyal to him after he attempted to overturn the 2020 election and the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack are reportedly leading this well-organized effort.
One specific idea identified by the Times involves bringing independent agencies more firmly under the president’s control.

These agencies were established within the executive branch to operate with a degree of autonomy, but Trump’s plans seek to change that.
Another proposal involves transforming the civil service and eliminating employment protections for career officials deemed involved in policymaking.

“We will demolish the deep state,” Trump said at a Michigan rally.
“We will expel the warmongers from our government. We will drive out the globalists. We will cast out the communists, Marxists, and fascists. And we will throw off the sick political class that hates our country.


Breaking the Cycle of Students Being Hungry During Summer

0

By Maya Pottiger, Word in Black 

Ryan Geske no longer hears “I’m hungry.”

As the director of operations at the Boys & Girls Clubs of Toledo, Ohio, this is no small feat.

The change came around 2007 when the Boys & Girls Clubs partnered with local organization Connecting Kids to Meals, which provides free, hot, and healthy meals to kids under 18.

“Kids would come and they would be hungry, and there wasn’t much that we could do 20 years ago,” Geske says. “Now we have that resource of a delicious hot lunch to serve.”


Alabama Republicans Reject Call for 2nd Majority Black District, Despite Supreme Court Ruling

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — Alabama Republicans, under orders of the U.S. Supreme Court to redraw congressional districts to give minority voters a greater voice in elections, rejected calls Monday to craft a second majority-Black district and proposed a map that could test what is required by the judges’ directive.

Lawmakers must adopt a new map by Friday after the high court in June affirmed a three-judge panel’s ruling that Alabama’s existing congressional map — with a single Black district out of seven statewide — likely violated the Voting Rights Act. In a state where more than one in four residents is Black, the lower court panel had ruled in 2022 that Alabama should have another majority-Black congressional district or something “close to it” so Black voters have the opportunity to “elect a representative of their choice.”

Republicans, who have been resistant to creating a certain Democratic district, proposed a map that would increase the percentage of Black voters in the 2nd congressional district from about 30% to nearly 42.5%, wagering that will satisfy the court’s directive.

House Speaker Pro Tempore Chris Pringle, who serves as co-chairman of the state redistricting committee, said the proposal complies with the order to provide a district in which Black voters have the “opportunity to elect the representative of their choice.”

“The goal here, for me, was to provide an opportunity for African-Americans to be elected to Congress in the second congressional district,” Pringle said.

However, the National Redistricting Foundation, one of the groups that backed challenges to the Alabama map, called the proposal “shameful” and said it would be challenged.

“It is clear that Alabama Republicans are not serious about doing their job and passing a compliant map, even in light of a landmark Supreme Court decision,” said Marina Jenkins, executive director of the National Redistricting Foundation.

She called that a pattern seen throughout the state’s history “where a predominately white and Republican legislature has never done the right thing on its own, but rather has had to be forced to do so by a court.”

The Permanent Legislative Committee on Reapportionment approved the proposal in a 14-6 vote that fell along party lines. The proposal was introduced as legislation Monday afternoon as lawmakers convened a special session to adopt a new map by a Friday deadline set by the three-judge panel. House Speaker Nathaniel Ledbetter said he believes the new district will be a swing district that could elect either a Democratic candidate or a Republican.

“I think that the models will show that it could go either way, probably. I think all the court’s asked for was a fair chance. I certaintly think that map does it. I don’t think there’s any question about that,” Ledbetter said.

Democrats accused Republicans of rushing the process and thwarting the court’s directive.

Sen. Vivian Davis Figures, a Democrat from Mobile, said the court was clear that the state should create a second majority-Black district or something close to it.

“Forty-two percent is not close to 50. In my opinion 48, 49 is close to 50,” Figures said. She had urged colleagues to adopt a proposal by the plaintiffs in the Supreme Court case that would make the 2nd district 50% Black.

Under the Republican plan, the state would continue to have one majority Black district, which is now represented by Rep. Terri Sewell. The Black voting age population of that district would drop from about 55% to 51.6%

Rep. Chris England, a Democrat from Tuscaloosa, said he also doesn’t think the GOP proposal would satisfy the court’s directive. He said Republican lawmakers pushed through their proposal without a public hearing or producing an analysis of the partisan leanings of the district.

“The map that we adopted, nobody had any input on. There was no public input on it, not subject to a public hearing — and now it’s going to be the map of choice,” England said.

Deuel Ross, a lawyer with the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund who argued the case before the Supreme Court, said they will challenge the proposal if it is enacted by the Alabama Legislature.

“Any plan with a low Black voting age population does not appear to comply with the Court’s instruction,” Ross wrote in an email.

Partisan politics underlies the looming redistricting fight. A higher percentage of Black voters increases the chances that a the seat will switch from GOP to Democratic control.

Pollster Zac McCrary said predicting a district’s partisan leanings depends on a number of metrics, but “getting a district too far below the mid 40s in terms of Black voter composition could certainly open the door for Republicans.”


Abortion Ban Worsens Already Deadly Black Maternal Mortality Crisis

By Barrington M. Salmon, The Washington Informer

One year after the far-right majority of the U.S. Supreme Court eviscerated Roe v. Wade, overturning almost 50 years of settled law, the blast radius from this calculated act has spread far and wide and continues to roil the country.

Michael Caruso, CEO and publisher of The New Republic shared his views on what the Republican Party, their rightwing allies and others have unleashed on the country.

“Meanwhile, out in the rest of America, the crisis is getting worse by the day. In the last year, Republicans have enacted abortion bans in 16 states – nearly half of which have no exceptions in cases of rape or incest – and they are trying to quickly add more,” Caruso said in a fundraising appeal. “Studies show half of Americans don’t know if medicated abortion is legal or not. And Republicans are now working to deny access to the widely used abortion drug mifepristone – even in states where it is perfectly legal – and to introduce a national ban in Congress.”

The result, Caruso said, is turmoil and a human toll of a kind not seen in recent times. Girls, some as young as 10, who have been raped by their fathers, uncles and other men around them, are being forced to have babies. Twenty-two states, with Republican-dominated legislatures, have banned abortions, others have almost-total bans, and in states like Georgia and Florida, abortions are banned after six weeks of pregnancy, a time when most women don’t even know they’re pregnant.

According to the New York Times, nine states, including Missouri, Kentucky and Alabama, have abortion bans with no exceptions for rape or incest. In Mississippi, it’s near-total ban has an exception for rape but not incest. Already, states where abortion is most limited are reporting increased rates of infant and maternal deaths and a concerning spiral of economic insecurity.

“All of this is having devastating consequences on a scale unknown for the last 50 years. Women are being forced to endure the trauma of giving birth as the result of rape or incest, and miscarriage patients are being denied lifesaving medical treatment,” he said. “Many people cannot scrape together the money for a long journey to a state where abortion is still legal, and some of those who can make the trip could face criminal charges for having a legal medical procedure.”

The ability to access abortions has always disproportionately affected Black and non-white women. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Black women account for almost 40% of all American abortions, despite African-Americans comprising 12% of America’s population. Black women routinely face racism inside and out of the medical community, sexism, lack of access to quality education and well-paying jobs. Often adding to the mix is: redlining, restrictive covenants, financial institutions denying Black families loans and pervasive and persistent racial inequities with the end-result being Black families living in or adjacent to poverty.

According to the CDC, African-American women are three to four times more likely to die of complications from pregnancy than white women, regardless of their social status, economic standing or education. In addition, infants born to Black mothers are dying at twice the rate of infants born to non-Hispanic white mothers. Meanwhile, a Black woman is 22% more likely to die from heart disease than a white woman, 71% more likely to perish from cervical cancer, and 243% more likely to die from pregnancy or childbirth-related causes, according to Eastern Virginia Medical School.

“The United States bears the worrying distinction as “deadliest nation” in the industrialized or “developed world” to be pregnant,” said Dr. Michele Bratcher Goodwin in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in June 2023. “Nationwide, as noted by Justice Breyer, “childbirth is 14 times more likely than abortion to result in death.” As reported by Nina Martin and Renee Montagne, “more American women are dying of pregnancy-related complications than any other developed country.” In fact, “only in the U.S. has the rate of women who die been rising.”

In fact, said Bratcher, an author, advocate and Abraham Pinanski Visiting Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, “a review of data collected by the United States Central Intelligence Agency provides evidence that it is safer to be pregnant and give birth in Iran, Tajikistan, and Bahrain than in the United States.

“In Mississippi, a woman is 118 times more likely to die by carrying a pregnancy to term than by having an abortion. According to the Mississippi Maternal Mortality Report, Black women accounted for “nearly 80% of pregnancy-related cardiac deaths” in that state.”

Political commentator author and consultant Dr. Avis Jones-DeWeever, said in an interview last year that the court ruling, the hysteria driving the anti-Critical Race Theory crowd and efforts by far-right Republicans to further disembowel the Voting Rights Act represent a cultural, social and political backlash.

“White people are experiencing trauma and understand that they are an emerging minority, said Jones-DeWeever, a diversity consultant and women’s empowerment expert. “They’re thinking they can force white women to have white babies, but white women will find ways to get abortions. This could actually accelerate the ‘browning of America.’”

Racism and classism already serve as formidable obstacles to the progress of Black and brown women, non-whites and marginalized communities, reproductive rights activists say. And the loss of abortion rights and access to safe, legal and affordable abortions will produce devastating consequences for African-American women.

We need to expand the Supreme Court because they can do damage for a long time.

JONES-DEWEEVER, PRESIDENT AND CEO OF INCITE UNLIMITED

Michelle Marks-Osbourne, a minister, scholar and activist, said she’s deeply dismayed by what she described as America’s descent into fascism.

“From my perspective as a minister and a Christian, them overturning Roe v. Wade and the joy exhibited in pulling apart the lives of women and children exposes American Christianity,” said Marks-Osbourne, an equity strategist and founder of the Marks-Osbourne Group, LLC. “When it comes to life, women are suing because they almost died.”

Marks-Osbourne castigated people who claim to be Christians but who revel in cruelty and punishing the most vulnerable in society.

“They cut SNAP and TANF, don’t support a living wage, and have no care for their neighbor in a Biblical fashion,” the North Carolina resident said. “This concerns me. That’s why I am pro-choice.”

Marks-Osbourne said Roe v. Wade had exposed these so-called Christians for the frauds they are.

“You have to come to people where they are, wherever they are. We need to show mercy and compassion. Roe has shown that it’s not there. Roe shows that we have a minority of 20 percent who are dictating this country’s direction and causing a grave amount of harm.”

Marks-Osbourne said white Christians exegetically interpret Scriptures “in the same way they did in slavery.”

“It’s a warped version of faith to do harm under the banner of love,” said Marks-Osbourne, who said she proudly embraces the label of disruptor. “These are people who force laws to be passed and people who stay silent and do nothing. This parallels Nazi Germany. As I think about the anniversary, I actually weep for women who need abortion care as healthcare.”

Yet even as Marks-Osbourne laments what anti-abortion forces have wrought, she and other advocates are fighting to confront and beat back the forces of regression, to hold ground and attempt to reverse the Supreme Court’s considerable damage.

Poll numbers from a variety of sources indicate how unpopular the Roe reversal is nationally.

According to a new NBC News poll, 61% of Americans oppose the Supreme Court decision. That includes 92% of Democrats, 60% of independents and 31% of Republicans. In that same poll, pollsters found that 80 percent of women 18 to 49 oppose the ruling.

“The anger, enthusiasm and fury hasn’t diminished. They are fighting against their rights being taken away,” said former Biden Press Secretary Jen Psaki, host of ‘Inside with Jen Psaki.’ “Women’s health and the right to healthcare is a fundamental right that was taken away. The GOP didn’t predict the length or scope of the backlash.”

In the year since the high court’s fateful decision, Republicans have lost election after election, primary and judicial races and the midterms.

Jones-DeWeever, president and CEO of Incite Unlimited, LLC, said seeing what the Supreme Court has done is infuriating because Black women and girls will suffer and be disproportionately hurt, maimed and killed since they lack the resources to travel for an abortion, or in many cases, pay for the procedure.

“We should also understand that this is just the beginning. If they are bold enough to overturn 50 years of precedent, what next? We’re screwed,” she said. “We need to expand the Supreme Court because they can do damage for a long time. If there is a bright side to this, it is that this might save Democrats in (future elections).”

_____

This post was originally published on The Washington Informer


To Feel Less Heat, We Need More Trees

By Ben Jealous, The Washington Informer

All of us suffered last week through day after day of the hottest average temperatures ever recorded on Earth. Now imagine it had been 10% hotter where you live.

That wasn’t hard to do for residents in urban neighborhoods where pavement, concrete and glass far surpass leafy trees. The people who live there pay a heat tax through their health and their economic well-being.

Roughly 80% of Americans live in urban areas and roughly 80% of those city dwellers live in neighborhoods with less than 20% tree cover. And those places with minimal tree canopy experience significantly higher temperatures than green neighborhoods just miles away. That’s true in big cities like Newark and New Orleans and smaller ones like Burlington, Vt., and Erie, Pa.


Hollywood Under Fire: Black Caucus Members Concerned About Black Women Execs Leaving Entertainment Industry

By Antonio Ray Harvey,  California Black Media

Film studios in Hollywood took a one-two punch last week after actors announced they were joining the ongoing writers’ strike and as legislators in Sacramento questioned their commitment to Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI).

On July 13, California Legislative Black Caucus (CLBC) members Sen. Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D-Los Angeles) and Assemblymember Tina McKinnor (D-Inglewood) led a group of lawmakers led a news conference at the State Capitol to express their concerns over various news reports of abrupt departures of Black women leaving high-profile careers in Hollywood after the state recently approved $1.6 billion in tax credits for the industry.

The press conference was held the same day the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), the union representing Hollywood actors, joined striking Writers Guild of America (WGA) members in the biggest labor dispute the American entertainment industry has seen in 63 years.

In recent weeks, several Black women who were executives leading Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives at major entertainment companies have left their positions.

“We are here today, calling on industry executives to meet with the state legislative Black caucus and leaders in the coming weeks to explain what is behind this erasure,” Smallwood-Cuevas (D-Los Angeles) said at the press briefing.

“(We want them to) provide the evidence of how diversity, inclusion and the progress made will continue to move forward given the lack of leadership and gravitas at the forefront of those proposals,” added Smallwood-Cuevas.

Netflix’s vice president, inclusion strategy, Vernā Myers; Disney’s LaTondra Newton, chief diversity officer and senior vice president; Joanna Abeyie, the British Broadcasting Company’s (BBC) creative diversity director; and Warner Bros executive, Terra Potts, executive vice president of worldwide marketing, have all moved on.

In addition, Warner Bros. Discovery’s DEI specialist Karen Horne and Jeanell English, executive VP of impact and inclusion at the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences left their DEI roles.

The lawmakers say more Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) could join the mass exodus.

Lawmakers at the press conference said the departure of DEI specialists from major Hollywood companies gives the impression that creating an inclusive culture in the American film industry is not a priority for a sector that has a well-documented history of discrimination and exclusion.

“As Vice Chair of the Asian and Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus, we are proud to stand in solidarity with the Black Caucus,” Sen.David Min said. “I don’t want to accuse anybody of anything, but it certainly looks suspicious when in a short timeframe after we pass the $1.6-billion tax credit was signed into law that we see a number of leading African American female Hollywood executives let go.”

Senate Bill (SB) 485, introduced last year by Sen. Anthony Portantino (D- La Cañada Flintridge), provides $1.65 billion in tax credits, or $330 million annually, in financial support for film and television makers and other media content creators. The California Film and Television Production Tax Credit Program was scheduled to sunset on June 30, 2025.

State lawmakers are now asking for meetings and are now looking for ways to hold television and film studios executives accountable for benefitting from state investment that essentially helped create DEI programs.

SB 485 was created after a series of production companies opted to leave California for states that offered larger tax incentive programs. The bill was amended to reflect California’s diverse population.

“I was highly offended to see the industry’s response to a $1.6 billion tax subsidy by quietly eliminating Black women from executive positions with a number of studios,” said McKinnor.

“Many of these women were involved in their studios’ diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, which raises a serious question about their commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion in the film industry.”

SB 485 states that “This bill, for credit allocations made on or after July 1, 2023, would revise the definition of qualified motion picture for purposes of the credit to require an applicant to provide a diversity workplan that includes goals that are broadly reflective of California’s population.

On July 10, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed SB 132 to extend the state’s $330 million-a-year Film and TV Tax Credit Program an additional five years through fiscal 2030-31.

The Governor’s office put out a statement that SB 132 builds “upon a strong track record of success” and “whose productions have generated more than $23 billion” for the economy.

More than 178,000 cast and crew have been supported by the program. The new budget will create the state’s fourth-generation film/TV tax credit program – known as “Program 4.0.”

“The California Film and Television Tax Credit program has led to the creation of hundreds of thousands of high paying union jobs, it’s supported countless local businesses, and pumped billions of dollars into the state’s economy,” said Charles Rivkin, Chairman and CEO of the Motion Picture Association. “The 4.0 version of the program, signed into law by Governor Newsom, will build on that success by creating new commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion and establishing a pilot program on production safety, among other provisions.”

McKinnor said, “While the California film tax credit 4.0 proposal builds upon previous work to solidify California as the entertainment capital of the world, it does not include requirements to increase diversity of its below-the-line hiring.

“The California film tax credit 4.0 only requires a good-faith effort. California, that’s not good enough,” McKinnor continued. “We should all expect more from an industry receiving $1.6 billion in subsidies from California taxpayers.”

Smallwood-Cuevas, McKinnor, and other members of the California legislature want to make amendments to SB 132 that will keep DEI programs intact.

They expect to sit down with members of the film and television industry, union representatives, and Gov. Newsom to get clarity of the entertainment business’ efforts to promote and stabilize DEI initiatives.

“We want progress towards real inclusion and equity in this industry and we want to make sure that our tax dollars are not in any way involved in this erasure,” Smallwood-Cuevas said. “We hope that these conversations will lead to a commitment and level of trust that will allow us to continue to move forward and expand our investment in this important industry.”


Accessibility Toolbar

Unlike many news organizations, Voice & Viewpoint delivers content that matters to you. Help us keep it that way by making a generous donation for as low as $2. Your support will fund local, investigative journalism for the community, by the community.

© The San Diego Voice and Viewpoint

Submit Community News Advertise Contact Us Subscribe Our Team Privacy Policy